ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[bc-gnso]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [bc-gnso] BC discussion on limited round new gTLDS

  • To: <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx>, <bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [bc-gnso] BC discussion on limited round new gTLDS
  • From: "BRUEGGEMAN, JEFF (ATTSI)" <jb7454@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 15:03:47 -0400

If there is not a limited round, then what are the priority issues that
should be addressed and what are the solutions to those open issues?

Jeff

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of philip.sheppard@xxxxxx
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2011 2:19 PM
To: bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [bc-gnso] BC discussion on limited round new gTLDS


If we are to get any traction on the concept of a limited round we need
to
answer the question: how do you limit?

The answer has to provide ICANN with a reassurance of being able to do
so
in an equitable way , that would not be subject to litigation.

Philip





<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy