ICANN ICANN Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[ccnso-idncctld] 答复: [ccnso-idncctld] IDNs

  • To: "'Edmon Chung'" <edmon@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <ccnso-idncctld@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [ccnso-idncctld] 答复: [ccnso-idncctld] IDNs
  • From: "zhangjian" <zhangjian@xxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 17:51:56 +0800

Hi Chris:

I agree with Edmon. Rather than “having consensus”, maybe “alternative
views” is the better words to describe it.






发件人: owner-ccnso-idncctld@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-ccnso-idncctld@xxxxxxxxx] 代表 Edmon Chung
发送时间: 2008年5月29日 16:07
收件人: ccnso-idncctld@xxxxxxxxx
主题: RE: [ccnso-idncctld] IDNs


Hi Chris,


Based on the discussion on the last few conference calls about Principle E
and that of objection (or I think a better way to describe it may be a
process to facilitate comments), I do not feel that what is drafted
currently could be described as a consensus.


At least in the call yesterday, out of about 6-7 active speakers, at least
3-4 brought out disagreements on the points.  This is consistent with the
previous few conference calls.


Therefore, rather than having reached consensus, I think it maybe better
characterized as having more than one alternative views about the issue.






From: owner-ccnso-idncctld@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-ccnso-idncctld@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Chris Disspain
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2008 7:06 AM
To: ccnso-idncctld@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [ccnso-idncctld] IDNs




Following the teleconference, for clarity, this is what we agreed:


a)  Bart and I will work on a ‘final’ version of the methodology report

b) In respect to Principle E and the possibility of an objection process,
the report will reflect the consensus as we understand it. However, at least
2 members of the WG feel that Principle E should be amended and that there
should be an objection process. Those who feel that way may, if they wish,
provide text setting out their position and this will be included in the

c)  We agreed that the LEAP text will be included for now.

d) We agreed that when the WG publishes the report (on or around 10 June) it
will state that we are still discussing some aspects, that we will be
meeting face to face on 21 June and we may make amendments. 


If I have missed anything please let me know.




Chris Disspain

CEO - auDA 

Australia's Domain Name Administrator




Important Notice - This email may contain information which is confidential
and/or subject to legal privilege, and is intended for the use of the named
addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use,
disclose or copy any part of this email. If you have received this email by
mistake, please notify the sender and delete this message immediately.
Please consider the environment before printing this email.



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy