Re: [ccnso-idncctld] Version 4

[HiroHOTTA <hotta@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Patrik,
You are always so good to help me 
in explaining my thought.
Hiro

On Sun, 22 Jun 2008 19:18:07 +0200
<patrik@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> What is the overall goal here? I might be able to help.
> 
> If the rule is that "anyone can apply for a idn-ccTLD where the TLD  
> requested have at least one character that is not LDH (a-z, 0-9) and  
> therefore according to IDNA need to be encoded with the xn--"?
> 
> An alternative is the above with "...except for accented characters a- 
> z" added at the end?
> 
>     Patrik
> 
> On 22 jun 2008, at 19.12, HiroHOTTA wrote:
> 
> >
> > It seems I've lost Versin 3.
> >
> > Anyway, I still cannot understand the meaning of the script
> > requirement on page-7 going as
> > ============================================================
> > For purposes of the Fast Track a non-Latin script is  used
> > here to designate any script that contains elements that are
> > not listed in the US-ASCII character set. This includes
> > Latin-based alphabets containing letters additional to the
> > twenty-six basic letters "a" through "z" or using those
> > letters with combining marks.
> > ============================================================
> > Does this mean any script having characters other than a-z
> > is called "a non-Latin script" ? How about French or German?
> > Can we make the definition clearer?
> >
> > (Maybe it's clear for all other than me)
> >
> > Hiro
> >
> >
> > On Sun, 22 Jun 2008 07:15:47 -0700
> > Bart Boswinkel <bart.boswinkel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> Dear all,
> >> Includd is an updated version following this mornings discussion  
> >> with the GAC. Present at the meeting were Patrik, Cary, Tina, Chris  
> >> and myself. The suggested changes will  substantive and help to  
> >> resolve  (some of) the issues the GAC has expressed this morning.
> >> Bart
> >
> >
>