ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[dssa]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[dssa] Reminder: Draft confidentiality guidelines

  • To: dssa@xxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: [dssa] Reminder: Draft confidentiality guidelines
  • From: "Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 16:38:32 -0600

<html><head><base href="x-msg://122/"></head><body style="word-wrap: 
break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; 
">hi all,<div><br></div><div>we, your Ops gang, decided on today's call to put 
a deadline on comments about our draft Confidential-Information guidelines. 
&nbsp;we're hoping to receive your comments by close of business (your time) 
this Friday, 20-January. &nbsp;that will give us a chance to review them on our 
call a week from today and push out a revised draft to you for consensus-review 
early next week.</div><div><br></div><div>so far, Katrina is the only person 
who's sent comments. &nbsp;she sent them to me and i got her permission to 
forward her comments to the list.</div><div><br></div><div>we discussed her 
comments on the Ops call today and realized that our draft guidelines doesn't 
do enough to explain why we think the "vouching" thing is a good idea. &nbsp;so 
let me sketch out a few points here and we'll work on a revised draft to make 
this idea clearer.</div><div><br></div><blockquote 
class="webkit-indent-blockquote" style="margin: 0 0 0 40px; border: none; 
padding: 0px;"><div>probably the most important issue we're trying to address 
with these rules is to build a web of trust and accountability around any 
information that is shared. &nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>we want to make 
sure that the people sharing highly sensitive information are assured that 
their information will not find its way out of the sub-group without their 
permission.</div><div><br></div><div>one way to do that is to automatically 
trust everybody in the DSSA and only block people if there's an objection 
(Katrina's proposal) the other is to initially not trust anybody in the DSSA 
and only allow them into the subgroup if they are endorsed by two others (the 
current version of the draft).</div><div><br></div><div>at this point, the 
co-chairs are still more comfortable with the vouch-in rather than the 
object-out model because it seems to us to be more secure, and our overriding 
goal is to ensure no breaches.</div><div><br></div><div>so why do co-chairs go 
first? &nbsp;our answer is that we need to start somewhere in order to "seed" 
the group with an initial set of members, and a basic set of trust 
relationships. &nbsp;this also means that we, the co-chairs, are the foundation 
on which all the rest of the trust fabric is built. &nbsp;that's something that 
i was initially a bit uncomfortable with. &nbsp;but we have to start somewhere 
and the co-chairs seem to be the best/logical place to 
start.</div><div><br></div><div>but that *also* means that we co-chairs bear 
the ultimate accountability for the security of the information, since all the 
rest of the "vouch" structure is built on our original vouches. &nbsp;again, 
that initially made me uncomfortable but i've concluded that i'm comfortable 
taking that responsibility. &nbsp;after all, that's why you pay me the big 
money. &nbsp;:-)</div><div><br></div><div>that in turn means that while i know 
many of you, i'm only willing to "vouch" for a subset of the group -- those 
people with whom i've done enough work, over enough time, to have concluded 
that i'm able to vouch for them. &nbsp;this turns out to be a fairly small 
group of people -- which makes sense when you think about it. &nbsp;that 
doesn't mean that i don't think badly of the rest of you, it's just that i 
don't have enough experience with most of you to to be accountable for your 
actions. &nbsp;this is not "friending you on Facebook", this is putting myself 
on the line to share the blame if you reveal extremely sensitive 
information.</div><div><br></div><div>so what about a person on the DSSA who 
doesn't know anybody else and thus can't collect the needed two "vouches" in 
order to participate the subgroup? &nbsp;i think there are two answers to this. 
&nbsp;the first is that this is something that falls on your shoulders to solve 
rather than mine. &nbsp;you can gain the trust trust of other members by 
working with them on other, less-sensitive, types of work so that they can form 
their opinion about whether they're comfortable standing behind you. &nbsp;i 
know, this sounds harsh and "clubby" but we may be engaged in very sensitive 
work here and i feel that i have to lay that out.</div><div><br></div><div>but 
the second answer is that maybe there is an alternative path to the two needed 
vouches. &nbsp;we talked this morning about the possibility that a person could 
extend the web of trust through non-DSSA members who *in turn* are known to 
members of the subgroup. &nbsp;the examples we used on our call were people 
like Vint Cerf and Paul Vixie but they could really be any person who are 
willing to participate in the trust/accountability chain of vouches. &nbsp;they 
would have to understand the responsibility they're taking on -- again, this 
isn't Facebook-friends type stuff. &nbsp;but that would be a way to get the job 
done.</div><div><br></div></blockquote>as you can see -- Katrina's comment was 
a GREAT one. &nbsp;it triggered a really interesting/thoughtful conversation on 
the Ops list and (i hope) will do the same on the larger list. &nbsp;thanks 
Katrina! &nbsp;i've attached her note below.<div><br></div><div>so let's hear 
from the rest of you. &nbsp;we'd like to put this to bed, but we'd also like it 
to be really really good, because it may be a model that other working groups 
can look at when they're dealing with sensitive information. &nbsp;so it's fine 
to hammer on it until it's right. &nbsp;again, we'd like to get your comments 
in by the end of the week if it's 
possible.</div><div><br></div><div>thanks,</div><div><br></div><div>mikey</div><div><br></div><div><br><div><div><br><div>Begin
 forwarded message:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote 
type="cite"><div style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; 
margin-left: 0px;"><span style="font-family:'Helvetica'; font-size:medium; 
color:rgba(0, 0, 0, 1);"><b>From: </b></span><span 
style="font-family:'Helvetica'; font-size:medium;">"Katrina Sataki" &lt;<a 
href="mailto:katrina@xxxxxx";>katrina@xxxxxx</a>&gt;<br></span></div><div 
style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 
0px;"><span style="font-family:'Helvetica'; font-size:medium; color:rgba(0, 0, 
0, 1);"><b>Date: </b></span><span style="font-family:'Helvetica'; 
font-size:medium;">January 12, 2012 7:54:06 AM CST<br></span></div><div 
style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 
0px;"><span style="font-family:'Helvetica'; font-size:medium; color:rgba(0, 0, 
0, 1);"><b>To: </b></span><span style="font-family:'Helvetica'; 
font-size:medium;">"'Mike O'Connor'" &lt;<a 
href="mailto:mike@xxxxxxxxxx";>mike@xxxxxxxxxx</a>&gt;<br></span></div><div 
style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 
0px;"><span style="font-family:'Helvetica'; font-size:medium; color:rgba(0, 0, 
0, 1);"><b>Subject: </b></span><span style="font-family:'Helvetica'; 
font-size:medium;"><b>Draft confidentiality 
guidelines</b><br></span></div><br><span class="Apple-style-span" 
style="border-collapse: separate; font-family: Helvetica; font-style: normal; 
font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 
normal; orphans: 2; text-align: -webkit-auto; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: 
none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; 
-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 0px; 
-webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: none; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; 
-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; font-size: medium; "><div lang="LV" link="blue" 
vlink="purple"><div class="WordSection1" style="page: WordSection1; "><div 
style="margin-top: 0cm; margin-right: 0cm; margin-left: 0cm; margin-bottom: 
0.0001pt; font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; 
"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></div><div style="margin-top: 0cm; margin-right: 0cm; 
margin-left: 0cm; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; font-size: 11pt; font-family: 
Calibri, sans-serif; ">Hi, Mikey,<o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin-top: 0cm; 
margin-right: 0cm; margin-left: 0cm; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; font-size: 11pt; 
font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; "><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></div><div 
style="margin-top: 0cm; margin-right: 0cm; margin-left: 0cm; margin-bottom: 
0.0001pt; font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; ">Thank you and 
your Co-Chairs very much for the document! It is perfectly 
clear.<o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin-top: 0cm; margin-right: 0cm; 
margin-left: 0cm; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; font-size: 11pt; font-family: 
Calibri, sans-serif; "><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></div><div style="margin-top: 0cm; 
margin-right: 0cm; margin-left: 0cm; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; font-size: 11pt; 
font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; ">However, the nasty ‘lawyerly’ side of me 
has some comments/questions:<o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin-top: 0cm; 
margin-right: 0cm; margin-left: 0cm; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; font-size: 11pt; 
font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; "><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></div><div 
style="margin-top: 0cm; margin-right: 0cm; margin-left: 36pt; margin-bottom: 
0.0001pt; font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; text-indent: 
-18pt; "><span>1)<span style="font: normal normal normal 7pt/normal 'Times New 
Roman'; ">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<span 
class="Apple-converted-space">&nbsp;</span></span></span>In the document 
several terms are used to describe the same thing „sub-working groups of the 
DSSA-WG”, „sub-working groups” and even „sub-groups” (the last one in the 
picture and use cases). Personally I would prefer the shortest version – 
sub-groups. It is quite clear that they a) are gonna work and b) are part of 
DSSA-WG.<o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin-top: 0cm; margin-right: 0cm; 
margin-left: 36pt; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; font-size: 11pt; font-family: 
Calibri, sans-serif; text-indent: -18pt; "><span>2)<span style="font: normal 
normal normal 7pt/normal 'Times New Roman'; 
">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<span 
class="Apple-converted-space">&nbsp;</span></span></span>In the picture it also 
says DSSA, not DSSA-WG as it is in the rest of the 
document.<o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin-top: 0cm; margin-right: 0cm; 
margin-left: 36pt; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; font-size: 11pt; font-family: 
Calibri, sans-serif; text-indent: -18pt; "><span>3)<span style="font: normal 
normal normal 7pt/normal 'Times New Roman'; 
">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<span 
class="Apple-converted-space">&nbsp;</span></span></span>page 2 - "Written 
information provided DSSA-WG members shall be considered" - 'to' is missing? Or 
'by'? Or I misunderstood the sentence?<o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin-top: 
0cm; margin-right: 0cm; margin-left: 36pt; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; font-size: 
11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; text-indent: -18pt; "><span>4)<span 
style="font: normal normal normal 7pt/normal 'Times New Roman'; 
">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<span 
class="Apple-converted-space">&nbsp;</span></span></span>Does it really matter 
what steps DNS-OARC procedures follow if DSSA-WG is not going to use some of 
them? I find it confusing: there it is - the full list - and then – oh, we’re 
not gonna follow it („...more like guidelines anyway...” (c) Pirates of 
Carribean). I think it would be better to list only those procedures DSSA-WG 
WILL follow and put a reference to DNS-OARC if necessary (e.g., as a footnote 
with explanations).<o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin-top: 0cm; margin-right: 
0cm; margin-left: 36pt; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; font-size: 11pt; font-family: 
Calibri, sans-serif; text-indent: -18pt; "><span>5)<span style="font: normal 
normal normal 7pt/normal 'Times New Roman'; 
">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<span 
class="Apple-converted-space">&nbsp;</span></span></span>Is the vouching 
process necessary? I mean, if Co-Chairs select members they vouch for them, 
don't you think?&nbsp; Maybe it is better to publish the list and then invite 
other WG members to object to any particular member being included into the 
sub-group. They could do it by sending a private e-mail, for example. And the 
Co-Chairs can evaluate if the objection is reasonable. Anyway, if there is 
anything wrong with any member of the DSSA then probably they should not be the 
part of the group. It is not a pay-and-become-a-member group as in the case of 
DNS-OARC.<o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin-top: 0cm; margin-right: 0cm; 
margin-left: 0cm; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; font-size: 11pt; font-family: 
Calibri, sans-serif; "><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></div><div style="margin-top: 0cm; 
margin-right: 0cm; margin-left: 0cm; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; font-size: 11pt; 
font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; ">At this point the nice technical persons 
wins and I stop with great appreciation of the work Co-Chairs did! Thank 
you!<o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin-top: 0cm; margin-right: 0cm; 
margin-left: 0cm; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; font-size: 11pt; font-family: 
Calibri, sans-serif; "><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></div><div style="margin-top: 0cm; 
margin-right: 0cm; margin-left: 0cm; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; font-size: 11pt; 
font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; ">Kind regards,<o:p></o:p></div><div 
style="margin-top: 0cm; margin-right: 0cm; margin-left: 0cm; margin-bottom: 
0.0001pt; font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; 
"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></div><div style="margin-top: 0cm; margin-right: 0cm; 
margin-left: 0cm; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; font-size: 11pt; font-family: 
Calibri, sans-serif; ">]{atrina<o:p></o:p></div><div style="margin-top: 0cm; 
margin-right: 0cm; margin-left: 0cm; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; font-size: 11pt; 
font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; "><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></div><div 
style="margin-top: 0cm; margin-right: 0cm; margin-left: 0cm; margin-bottom: 
0.0001pt; font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; 
"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></div><div style="margin-top: 0cm; margin-right: 0cm; 
margin-left: 0cm; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; font-size: 11pt; font-family: 
Calibri, sans-serif; "><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></div><div style="margin-top: 0cm; 
margin-right: 0cm; margin-left: 0cm; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; font-size: 11pt; 
font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; "><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: 
Arial, sans-serif; color: black; "><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></div><div 
style="margin-top: 0cm; margin-right: 0cm; margin-left: 0cm; margin-bottom: 
0.0001pt; font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; "><b><span 
style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial, sans-serif; ">-- Katrina 
Sataki,<span class="Apple-converted-space">&nbsp;</span></span></b><span 
style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial, sans-serif; 
">CEO<o:p></o:p></span></div><div style="margin-top: 0cm; margin-right: 0cm; 
margin-left: 0cm; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; font-size: 11pt; font-family: 
Calibri, sans-serif; "><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial, 
sans-serif; color: black; "><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></div><div 
style="margin-top: 0cm; margin-right: 0cm; margin-left: 0cm; margin-bottom: 
0.0001pt; font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; "><span 
style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial, sans-serif; color: black; "><img 
width="187" height="75" id="Picture_x0020_1" alt="emlogo" apple-width="yes" 
apple-height="yes" 
src="cid:image003.jpg@01CCD142.6A266690"><o:p></o:p></span></div><div 
style="margin-top: 0cm; margin-right: 0cm; margin-left: 0cm; margin-bottom: 
0.0001pt; font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; "><span 
style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial, sans-serif; color: black; 
"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></div><div style="margin-top: 0cm; margin-right: 0cm; 
margin-left: 0cm; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; font-size: 11pt; font-family: 
Calibri, sans-serif; "><b><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial, 
sans-serif; color: gray; ">NIC.LV</span></b><span style="font-size: 10pt; 
font-family: Arial, sans-serif; color: gray; "><span 
class="Apple-converted-space">&nbsp;</span><b>– The Registry of ccTLD 
.lv</b><o:p></o:p></span></div><div style="margin-top: 0cm; margin-right: 0cm; 
margin-left: 0cm; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; font-size: 11pt; font-family: 
Calibri, sans-serif; "><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial, 
sans-serif; color: gray; ">Institute of Mathematics and Computer 
Science,<o:p></o:p></span></div><div style="margin-top: 0cm; margin-right: 0cm; 
margin-left: 0cm; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; font-size: 11pt; font-family: 
Calibri, sans-serif; "><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial, 
sans-serif; color: gray; ">University of Latvia<o:p></o:p></span></div><div 
style="margin-top: 0cm; margin-right: 0cm; margin-left: 0cm; margin-bottom: 
0.0001pt; font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; "><span 
style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial, sans-serif; color: gray; ">Raina 
bulvaris 29, Riga LV-1459<o:p></o:p></span></div><div style="margin-top: 0cm; 
margin-right: 0cm; margin-left: 0cm; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; font-size: 11pt; 
font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; "><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: 
Arial, sans-serif; color: gray; ">Tel: +371 67085858 | Fax: +371 67225072 | 
Mobile: +371 29249666<o:p></o:p></span></div><div style="margin-top: 0cm; 
margin-right: 0cm; margin-left: 0cm; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; font-size: 11pt; 
font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; "><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: 
Arial, sans-serif; color: gray; ">E-mail:<span 
class="Apple-converted-space">&nbsp;</span><a href="mailto:katrina@xxxxxx"; 
style="color: blue; text-decoration: underline; ">katrina@xxxxxx</a><span 
class="Apple-converted-space">&nbsp;</span>| Skype: kat..s | Web:<span 
class="Apple-converted-space">&nbsp;</span><a href="http://www.nic.lv"; 
style="color: blue; text-decoration: underline; "><span style="color: gray; 
">www.nic.lv</span></a><o:p></o:p></span></div><div style="margin-top: 0cm; 
margin-right: 0cm; margin-left: 0cm; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; font-size: 11pt; 
font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; 
"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></div></div></div></span></blockquote></div><br><div>
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: separate; color: rgb(0, 
0, 0); font-family: Helvetica; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; 
font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2; 
text-align: auto; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; 
widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 0px; 
-webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: none; 
-webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; font-size: 
medium; "><div><div style="font-size: 12px; ">- - - - - - - - -</div><div 
style="font-size: 12px; ">phone&nbsp;<span class="Apple-tab-span" 
style="white-space: pre; ">   </span>651-647-6109 &nbsp;</div><div 
style="font-size: 12px; ">fax &nbsp;<span class="Apple-tab-span" 
style="white-space: pre; ">               </span>866-280-2356 &nbsp;</div><div 
style="font-size: 12px; ">web&nbsp;<span class="Apple-tab-span" 
style="white-space: pre; ">        </span><a 
href="http://www.haven2.com";>http://www.haven2.com</a></div><div 
style="font-size: 12px; ">handle<span class="Apple-tab-span" 
style="white-space: pre; ">     </span>OConnorStP (ID for public places like 
Twitter, Facebook, Google, etc.)</div></div></span>
</div>
<br></div></div></body></html>

JPEG image



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy