<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [dssa] FOR CONSENSUS-REVIEW -- Confidentiality Guidlelines
- To: "Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [dssa] FOR CONSENSUS-REVIEW -- Confidentiality Guidlelines
- From: Cheryl Langdon-Orr <langdonorr@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 14:20:17 +1000
Please note my "I'm happy with this" ....
*Cheryl Langdon-Orr ... **(CLO)*
http://about.me/cheryl.LangdonOrr
On 27 April 2012 09:42, Mike O'Connor <mike@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> hi all,
>
> those of us who where on the call today think that this version of the
> Confidentiality Guidelines is ready for a final consensus-review and
> approval on the next call. our habit is to send consensus-review items out
> to the list in order to give people who missed the call a chance to review
> the document one last time and raise any final issues they see. as a
> courtesy to those who've worked so hard on this, i'd ask that you review
> this *soon* and get comments back to the list as soon as possible so that
> we can resolve any late-breaking issues quickly.
>
> i'm attaching two versions. the Word version has all the changes in it if
> you'd like to see them.
>
> thanks,
>
> mikey
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> - - - - - - - - -
> phone 651-647-6109
> fax 866-280-2356
> web http://www.haven2.com
> handle OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google,
> etc.)
>
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|