<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [dssa] FOR CONSENSUS-REVIEW -- Confidentiality Guidlelines
- To: "Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [dssa] FOR CONSENSUS-REVIEW -- Confidentiality Guidlelines
- From: Julie Hammer <julie.hammer@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 17:04:31 +1000
Thanks, Mikey. Looks good to me.
Cheers, Julie
On 27/04/2012, at 9:42 AM, Mike O'Connor wrote:
hi all,
those of us who where on the call today think that this version of the
Confidentiality Guidelines is ready for a final consensus-review and approval
on the next call. our habit is to send consensus-review items out to the list
in order to give people who missed the call a chance to review the document one
last time and raise any final issues they see. as a courtesy to those who've
worked so hard on this, i'd ask that you review this *soon* and get comments
back to the list as soon as possible so that we can resolve any late-breaking
issues quickly.
i'm attaching two versions. the Word version has all the changes in it if
you'd like to see them.
thanks,
mikey
<DSSA - WG Confidentiality Guidelines - 21 April 2012.pdf>
<DSSA - WG Confidentiality Guidelines - 21 April 2012.doc>
- - - - - - - - -
phone 651-647-6109
fax 866-280-2356
web http://www.haven2.com
handle OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google, etc.)
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|