Re: [gnso-idn-wg] Addition to Section 4.2.1

["Sophia B" <sophiabekele@xxxxxxxxx>]

Good point Yoav,

I think this is very important to be inclusive of all experiments, which
ICANN may not be all aware of.  This is one of the major points that will
enable the expression of local/language communities interests.

Sophia


On 18/03/07, Hong Xue <hongxueipr@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Dear Yoav,
>
> Thanks for raising this point. I second your suggestion and recommend to
> paraphrase it a bit further.
>
>
> Section 4.2.1
>
> Support for considering local/regional pre-existing developments regarding
> IDN gTLDs, for example, the experimental IDN system developed by the Arab
> League, ***Chinese language community and other communities in a smaller
> scale*** when considering introduction of new IDN gTLDs, ***to avoid
> potential confusion/backlash.***
>
>
>
> Hong, ALAC Liaison
>
>
>
>
> On 3/18/07, Yoav Keren <yoav@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >  Ram, Olof, all,
> >
> >
> >
> > The issue in section 4.2.1 is an issue that was probably brought up
> > during a call that I have missed. First I would like to state my own support
> > for this view. Second, I think we should elaborate a little more and add
> > more examples and clarification to this point. I would like to offer the
> > following wording, which is the original one with two short additions marked
> > between 3 stars:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Support for considering local/regional pre-existing developments
> > regarding IDN gTLDs, for example, the experimental IDN system run by the
> > Arab League, ***China and other countries in a smaller scale*** when
> > considering introduction of new IDN gTLDs, ***to avoid potential
> > confusion/backlash.***
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> >
> >
> > Yoav
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >