ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-idn-wg]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [gnso-idn-wg] On 4.4.2

  • To: gnso-idn-wg@xxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: Re: [gnso-idn-wg] On 4.4.2
  • From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 18:33:36 +0100


On 19 mar 2007, at 19.21, Alexei Sozonov wrote:

Strange, if any fair person would support aliasing (critically sensitive for locals issue) for whatever “reduce confusion” reason.

well, i think we need to differentiate:

- there is a notion of granting automatic aliasing to all existing tld holders. I do not know how strong the support for that is, but it is certainly not something i support. and it is not, as far as i can, envisioned in the current discussions.

- there is the notion of limited aliasing for idn applicants that i have been advocating which i do believe is a reasonable facilitation mechanism.

Which notion of aliasing are you referring to?

a.





<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy