<<<
Chronological Index
>>>    <<<
Thread Index
>>>
 
Re: [gnso-idn-wg] 4.3.3 elevation to Agreeement...
- To: rmohan@xxxxxxxxxxxx
 
- Subject: Re: [gnso-idn-wg] 4.3.3 elevation to Agreeement...
 
- From: "Tan, William" <William.Tan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
 
- Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 01:44:00 -0400
 
 
 
I second that. Not sure how that translate to the new document / BCP 
that ICANN is planning to move towards though. 
Perhaps Tina can weigh in on that. 
 
=wil  
Ram Mohan wrote:
 I recommend we move 4.3.3 to Agreement, especially since all new 
registries are going to be contractually required to comply with the 
ICANN IDN Guidelines anyway. 
 
  
 
*4.3.3 (OLD)*  
*Support* for pursuing compliance with ICANN IDN Guidelines.  
 
Note: The New gTLD Recommendations foresee compliance with ICANN IDN 
Guidelines as a standard contractual condition. 
 
--  
*4.3.3 (SUGGESTED NEW)*  
Agreement that all new IDN gTLD applicants must comply with ICANN IDN 
Guidelines. 
 
  
 
-Ram  
 
 
  
 
 
<<<
Chronological Index
>>>    <<<
Thread Index
>>>
 
 |