<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-irtpd] Here's the summary of the framing questions we developed on the call today
- To: "Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-irtpd] Here's the summary of the framing questions we developed on the call today
- From: Angie Graves <angie12345@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 12:06:40 -0400
Thanks for this, Mike!
Angie
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Mike O'Connor <mike@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> hi all,
>
> thanks for saving me all that drafting time. here's a copy of what we
> came up with today
>
>
> Dispute resolution mechanisms
>
>
> Document informal AND formal mechanisms
> Informal mechanisms
> more attractive
> faster/easier
> Formal mechanisms
> used as last resort
> data suggests that they're rarely used
> reasons for low use
> not effective?
> unknown
> Describe 1st and 2nd level providers
> Registries
> ICANN approved 2nd level providers
> Helpful approach -- use cases
>
>
> Changes since we were chartered
> TEAC
> Vast increase in registry operators
> "Change of registrant" and associated policy/process changes
>
>
> Questions to ask
> Are they sufficient?
> Are they appropriate?
> Are they to be preferred?
> Are they even needed?
> Who provides them?
> Layers in the formal process
> Registries and ICANN-approved 2nd level providers
> Should this be retained or should Registries be dropped
> out?
> Who is using them?
> Who is aware of them? Are the right people aware of them?
> How did they become aware?
> Are they/should they be informed by their Registrar
>
>
> PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: www.haven2.com, HANDLE:
> OConnorStP (ID for Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.)
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|