<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-irtpd] here's the little summary of that sequence of events i rattled off on the call just now -- registrant role in TDRP
- To: "Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>, Volker Greimann <vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-irtpd] here's the little summary of that sequence of events i rattled off on the call just now -- registrant role in TDRP
- From: "James M. Bladel" <jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2013 16:27:37 +0000
Good thoughts everyone. I think perhaps we should try to capture the various
scenarios in the “Reasons for Denial” area, where a registrar can legitimately
deny a registrant’s request to initiate a TDRP.
For example: if the Registrant believes that the identity of the registrant is
in question, or that they cannot substantiate that they were ever the
legitimate registrant (or Transfer Contact) for the name pre-transfer. If its
a scenario in which the registrar has violated the IRTP, (or even the shiny new
TDRP we’re developing), then that is a matter for Compliance and the
registrar's accreditation could be at-risk. But we should avoid any process
where a registrar is compelled to initiate a TDRP that they believe is without
merit, -and- be forced to pay for the proceedings.
Thanks—
J.
From: Mike O'Connor <mike@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:mike@xxxxxxxxxx>>
Date: Tuesday, December 3, 2013 at 10:09
To: Volker Greimann
<vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Cc: "gnso-irtpd@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-irtpd@xxxxxxxxx>"
<gnso-irtpd@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-irtpd@xxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: Re: [gnso-irtpd] here's the little summary of that sequence of events
i rattled off on the call just now -- registrant role in TDRP
hi Volker,
i'm trying to remedy the situation where a registrar is either in violation of
the IRTP themselves (refusing to allow the registrant to transfer out) or is
presumptively denying the registrant due process in a dispute between
registrars. this was recognized as an oversight in the policy back in the
misty past when this series of IRTP PDPs was launched.
i don't care how this happens. registrars are probably in the best position to
figure out the best way to get this done and i'm happy to leave that discussion
up to them. i like James' "put pressure on Registrars to comply" approach
since that seems like a lighter/simpler one but i can live with anything that
fixes that problem. what i'm not keen on the idea of leaving registrants in
their current situation where these decisions get made "for them" by registrars
with no recourse for trapped registrants except worldwide courts.
On Dec 3, 2013, at 9:51 AM, Volker Greimann
<vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Hi Mike,
you are assuming that registrants should be beneficiaries of the TDRP. They are
not. Therefore a registrar not initiating a TDRP is not blocking the
registrants access as they do not have such an access in the first place.
If you want to give the registrant a way to force a registrar to initiate a
proceeding against another registrar, that is another story, but that way needs
to include an obligation of the registrant to pay the costs and a right of a
registrar to charge for this service (to cover the work needed to handle the
process).
Volker
i think the key distinction i want to draw is with your sentence "give
registrants access to" the TDRP. that's not the intent. the intent is to
ensure that registrants are not blocked from that process by their registrar.
the hope here is to provide an appeal mechanism in those cases where registrar
and registrant disagree on whether a TDRP is warranted. but i'm fine setting
the bar for that appeal pretty high.
On Dec 2, 2013, at 11:47 AM, Volker Greimann
<vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
I still feel that giving registrants access to the TDRP process dilutes its
purpose as an inter-registrar dispute process designed to deal with process
violations and will turn it into a transfer dispute process between
registrants, dragging registrars and registries into a civil conflict between
two parties. This will result in increased costs and work for contracted
parties.
If a registrar is violating transfer processes, there will be sufficient
incentive for affected registrars to call them out and if necessary invoke the
current process.
What we need to look at instead is if creating an alternate process between
registrant and former registrant regarding the ownership of a domain name makes
sense.
I am also a big fan of the line "He who wants to hear the music should pay for
the band!", i.e. if a registrant wants a process to be invoked, he should be
prepared to pony up the fees, just as with the UDRP. Adding a "loser pays"
clause makes sense to me, but in that case it will remain the risk of the
complainant that the respondent cannot pay/is unreachable/etc...
Volker
Provide the ability for the registrant to trigger the TDRP process in cases
when they disagree with their registrar over an IRTP issue
* In general, registrars initiate TDRP when they can't resolve matters
between themselves
In the case of disagreement between registrar and registrant as to whether to
initiate a TDRP, provide a path for the registrant to take the issue to
Compliance
Build minimum documentation requirements for registrants into the policy as a
filter to prevent frivolous filings
If Compliance agrees with registrant, TDRP proceeds as normal, with fees paid
by registrars, as normal
If Compliance disagrees with registrant, that's it -- it's off to court if the
registrant wants to proceed.
PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB:
www.haven2.com<http://www.haven2.com/>, HANDLE: OConnorStP (ID for Twitter,
Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.)
--
Bei weiteren Fragen stehen wir Ihnen gerne zur Verfügung.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Volker A. Greimann
- Rechtsabteilung -
Key-Systems GmbH
Im Oberen Werk 1
66386 St. Ingbert
Tel.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 901
Fax.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 851
Email: vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Web: www.key-systems.net<http://www.key-systems.net/> /
www.RRPproxy.net<http://www.rrpproxy.net/>www.domaindiscount24.com<http://www.domaindiscount24.com/>
/ www.BrandShelter.com<http://www.brandshelter.com/>
Folgen Sie uns bei Twitter oder werden Sie unser Fan bei Facebook:
www.facebook.com/KeySystems<http://www.facebook.com/KeySystems>www.twitter.com/key_systems<http://www.twitter.com/key_systems>
Geschäftsführer: Alexander Siffrin
Handelsregister Nr.: HR B 18835 - Saarbruecken
Umsatzsteuer ID.: DE211006534
Member of the KEYDRIVE GROUP
www.keydrive.lu<http://www.keydrive.lu/>
Der Inhalt dieser Nachricht ist vertraulich und nur für den angegebenen
Empfänger bestimmt. Jede Form der Kenntnisgabe, Veröffentlichung oder
Weitergabe an Dritte durch den Empfänger ist unzulässig. Sollte diese Nachricht
nicht für Sie bestimmt sein, so bitten wir Sie, sich mit uns per E-Mail oder
telefonisch in Verbindung zu setzen.
--------------------------------------------
Should you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Best regards,
Volker A. Greimann
- legal department -
Key-Systems GmbH
Im Oberen Werk 1
66386 St. Ingbert
Tel.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 901
Fax.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 851
Email: vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Web: www.key-systems.net<http://www.key-systems.net/> /
www.RRPproxy.net<http://www.rrpproxy.net/>www.domaindiscount24.com<http://www.domaindiscount24.com/>
/ www.BrandShelter.com<http://www.brandshelter.com/>
Follow us on Twitter or join our fan community on Facebook and stay updated:
www.facebook.com/KeySystems<http://www.facebook.com/KeySystems>www.twitter.com/key_systems<http://www.twitter.com/key_systems>
CEO: Alexander Siffrin
Registration No.: HR B 18835 - Saarbruecken
V.A.T. ID.: DE211006534
Member of the KEYDRIVE GROUP
www.keydrive.lu<http://www.keydrive.lu/>
This e-mail and its attachments is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. Furthermore it is not permitted to publish any content of this
email. You must not use, disclose, copy, print or rely on this e-mail. If an
addressing or transmission error has misdirected this e-mail, kindly notify the
author by replying to this e-mail or contacting us by telephone.
PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB:
www.haven2.com<http://www.haven2.com/>, HANDLE: OConnorStP (ID for Twitter,
Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.)
--
Bei weiteren Fragen stehen wir Ihnen gerne zur Verfügung.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Volker A. Greimann
- Rechtsabteilung -
Key-Systems GmbH
Im Oberen Werk 1
66386 St. Ingbert
Tel.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 901
Fax.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 851
Email: vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Web: www.key-systems.net<http://www.key-systems.net/> /
www.RRPproxy.net<http://www.rrpproxy.net/>www.domaindiscount24.com<http://www.domaindiscount24.com/>
/ www.BrandShelter.com<http://www.brandshelter.com/>
Folgen Sie uns bei Twitter oder werden Sie unser Fan bei Facebook:
www.facebook.com/KeySystems<http://www.facebook.com/KeySystems>www.twitter.com/key_systems<http://www.twitter.com/key_systems>
Geschäftsführer: Alexander Siffrin
Handelsregister Nr.: HR B 18835 - Saarbruecken
Umsatzsteuer ID.: DE211006534
Member of the KEYDRIVE GROUP
www.keydrive.lu<http://www.keydrive.lu/>
Der Inhalt dieser Nachricht ist vertraulich und nur für den angegebenen
Empfänger bestimmt. Jede Form der Kenntnisgabe, Veröffentlichung oder
Weitergabe an Dritte durch den Empfänger ist unzulässig. Sollte diese Nachricht
nicht für Sie bestimmt sein, so bitten wir Sie, sich mit uns per E-Mail oder
telefonisch in Verbindung zu setzen.
--------------------------------------------
Should you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Best regards,
Volker A. Greimann
- legal department -
Key-Systems GmbH
Im Oberen Werk 1
66386 St. Ingbert
Tel.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 901
Fax.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 851
Email: vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Web: www.key-systems.net<http://www.key-systems.net/> /
www.RRPproxy.net<http://www.rrpproxy.net/>www.domaindiscount24.com<http://www.domaindiscount24.com/>
/ www.BrandShelter.com<http://www.brandshelter.com/>
Follow us on Twitter or join our fan community on Facebook and stay updated:
www.facebook.com/KeySystems<http://www.facebook.com/KeySystems>www.twitter.com/key_systems<http://www.twitter.com/key_systems>
CEO: Alexander Siffrin
Registration No.: HR B 18835 - Saarbruecken
V.A.T. ID.: DE211006534
Member of the KEYDRIVE GROUP
www.keydrive.lu<http://www.keydrive.lu/>
This e-mail and its attachments is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. Furthermore it is not permitted to publish any content of this
email. You must not use, disclose, copy, print or rely on this e-mail. If an
addressing or transmission error has misdirected this e-mail, kindly notify the
author by replying to this e-mail or contacting us by telephone.
PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB:
www.haven2.com<http://www.haven2.com>, HANDLE: OConnorStP (ID for Twitter,
Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.)
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|