Re: [gnso-irtpd] Initial Report Update

[Lars Hoffmann <lars.hoffmann@xxxxxxxxx>]

Dear Holly, dear all,

Thank you for pointing this out. Would it work for you/the Group if we included 
the following paragraph into Section 5.2.4.3 (Recommendation Charter Question 
D):

In combination with the improvements to the ICANN website, the Working Group 
recommends that ICANN Compliance clearly indicates on its FAQ/help section 
under which circumstances it can assist registrants with transfer disputes. 
This should include situations when registrants can ask ICANN Compliance to 
insist on registrars taking action on behalf of said registrant because ICANN 
policies may not have been complied with by one or several registrars.

In addition, the draft agenda for today's call below.
Best wishes, Lars


Draft Agenda: IRTP Part D PDP WG, Monday 10 February 2013, 16.00 UTC

1. Roll Call / SOI Updates

2. Discussion on Draft Initial Report
- Recommendations on p. 22 onwards

3. If time: First read through the Use Cases (Annex C)

4. Next steps / confirm next meeting






From: Holly Raiche <h.raiche@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:h.raiche@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Date: Sunday, February 9, 2014 8:25 PM
To: Lars Hoffmann <lars.hoffmann@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:lars.hoffmann@xxxxxxxxx>>
Cc: "gnso-irtpd@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-irtpd@xxxxxxxxx>" 
<gnso-irtpd@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-irtpd@xxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: Re: [gnso-irtpd] Initial Report Update

Hi Lars

I think we went further on the registrants' issue.  Apart from an improved 
ICANN website with full information, we suggested that registrants should be 
able to go to compliance to have them insist the relevant registrar take action 
on behalf of the registrant when an ICANN policy/requirement has not been 
complied with - and this possibility of action by compliance be included in the 
FAQ/website

Thanks

Holly


On 07/02/2014, at 2:42 AM, Lars Hoffmann wrote:

Dear all,
Please find attached an updated version of the Initial Report.
I have accepted all changes made by Mikey in last week's draft since there were 
no objections to them on the call. I have then focused the edits on  changes to 
WG Observations and Recommendations – based on the outcome of Monday's call. I 
have not yet combined the sections of Issue Description and WG Observations 
that was suggested by the Group but it is on the list for the next update.
Best wishes,
Lars





<GNSO Initial Report V2.docx>