<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-irtpd] Initial Report Update
- To: Lars Hoffmann <Lars.hoffmann@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-irtpd] Initial Report Update
- From: Holly Raiche <h.raiche@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 20:42:57 +1100
Thanks Lars
That does reflect the discussions we have had
Holly
On 10/02/2014, at 7:45 PM, Lars Hoffmann wrote:
> Dear Holly, dear all,
>
> Thank you for pointing this out. Would it work for you/the Group if we
> included the following paragraph into Section 5.2.4.3 (Recommendation Charter
> Question D):
>
> In combination with the improvements to the ICANN website, the Working Group
> recommends that ICANN Compliance clearly indicates on its FAQ/help section
> under which circumstances it can assist registrants with transfer disputes.
> This should include situations when registrants can ask ICANN Compliance to
> insist on registrars taking action on behalf of said registrant because ICANN
> policies may not have been complied with by one or several registrars.
>
> In addition, the draft agenda for today's call below.
> Best wishes, Lars
>
>
> Draft Agenda: IRTP Part D PDP WG, Monday 10 February 2013, 16.00 UTC
>
> 1. Roll Call / SOI Updates
>
> 2. Discussion on Draft Initial Report
> - Recommendations on p. 22 onwards
>
> 3. If time: First read through the Use Cases (Annex C)
>
> 4. Next steps / confirm next meeting
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Holly Raiche <h.raiche@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Sunday, February 9, 2014 8:25 PM
> To: Lars Hoffmann <lars.hoffmann@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: "gnso-irtpd@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-irtpd@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [gnso-irtpd] Initial Report Update
>
> Hi Lars
>
> I think we went further on the registrants' issue. Apart from an improved
> ICANN website with full information, we suggested that registrants should be
> able to go to compliance to have them insist the relevant registrar take
> action on behalf of the registrant when an ICANN policy/requirement has not
> been complied with - and this possibility of action by compliance be included
> in the FAQ/website
>
> Thanks
>
> Holly
>
>
> On 07/02/2014, at 2:42 AM, Lars Hoffmann wrote:
>
>> Dear all,
>> Please find attached an updated version of the Initial Report.
>> I have accepted all changes made by Mikey in last week's draft since there
>> were no objections to them on the call. I have then focused the edits on
>> changes to WG Observations and Recommendations – based on the outcome of
>> Monday's call. I have not yet combined the sections of Issue Description and
>> WG Observations that was suggested by the Group but it is on the list for
>> the next update.
>> Best wishes,
>> Lars
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> <GNSO Initial Report V2.docx>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|