RE: [gnso-lockpdp-wg] Proposed agenda and materials for review

[Nathalie Peregrine <nathalie.peregrine@xxxxxxxxx>]

Dear Gabi,

Thank you for this, your apology has been noted.

Kind regards

Nathalie

From: owner-gnso-lockpdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-lockpdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx] 
On Behalf Of Gabriela Szlak
Sent: jeudi 21 février 2013 15:00
To: Marika Konings
Cc: Gnso-lockpdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-lockpdp-wg] Proposed agenda and materials for review

Dear all,

I am very sorry that I won´t be able to be at the call today either.
These weeks have been complicated as I am covering for a colleague who is on 
vacations and I need to be at the courts at the time of the calls.
I will review the docs and if I have any edits or questions I will let you know
My apologies again,
Gabi


--

Gabriela Szlak
Regional Director

RED/ODR & eGobernanza (IG)

eInstituto<http://www.einstituto.org>
25 de mayo 611 Piso 3º  - C1002ABM
Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires - Argentina
(+54 11) 4878-0179
Twitte: @gabiszlak

Skype: gabrielaszlak
odr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:odr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

egobernanza@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:egobernanza@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>





2013/2/19 Marika Konings 
<marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>>
Dear All,

Please find below the proposed agenda for the next UDRP Domain Name Lock WG 
meeting (Thursday 21 February at 15.00 UTC). You are strongly encouraged to 
review the latest version of the straw man proposal (attached) and share any 
remaining comments / edits with the mailing list ahead of the meeting as the 
aim is to 'finalise' the straw man proposal following Thursday's call for 
inclusion in the Initial Report. You are also encouraged to start reviewing the 
latest draft of the Initial Report (see attached).

Thanks

Marika

Proposed Agenda - UDRP Domain Name Lock Working Group Meeting 21 February 2013

 1.  Roll Call / SOI Updates
 2.  Review of latest version of straw man proposal (see attached)
 3.  Definition of 'lock' - in the straw man proposal we define 'lock' in this 
context as preventing any changes of registrar and registrant. Does more work 
need to be done on this definition, or should we just create an additional 
recommendation that provides this definition?
 4.  Deadlines for review of straw man proposal and Initial Report Review
 5.  Next steps / confirm next meeting