Re: [gnso-osc] FW: Final response to the CCT

[Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>]

This is a very clear and well written document. I do not see any further 
changes that need to be made.

Thanks,

Stéphane

Le 30 nov. 2009 à 19:58, Gomes, Chuck a écrit :

> Thanks to Ken, the proposed OSC response to the CCT Final Recommendations is 
> attached in both redline and clean versions.  Note that the latest changes 
> are in response to comments made by OSC members and he included comments in 
> the redline version that shows that.
>  
> I would like to finalize this response ASAP this week and send it to Mason as 
> chair of the CCT.  Please do one final review.  If you approve the document, 
> please state so by Thursday of this week.  If you approve it with any 
> additional edits, please provide the edits NLT Thursday of this week.  Unless 
> anyone requests more time, I will assume that the document is approved by any 
> who do not respond by Thursday.
>  
> Thanks, Chuck
> 
> From: Ken Bour [mailto:ken.bour@xxxxxxxxxxx] 
> Sent: Monday, November 30, 2009 1:24 PM
> To: Gomes, Chuck
> Cc: 'Julie Hedlund'; 'Robert Hoggarth'
> Subject: RE: Final response to the CCT
> 
> Chuck:
>  
> Attached is Draft-v3 of the OSC letter to Mason Cole with the second round of 
> feedback incorporated—see track changes and margin comments!  Input was 
> received on the email list by:
> 1.      Wolf-Ulrich
> 2.      Chuck
> 3.      Philip
> 4.      Ron
> 5.      Vanda
> 6.      Steve
>  
> I attached both REDLINE and CLEAN versions for your convenience.
>  
> Ken
>  
>  
> From: Gomes, Chuck [mailto:cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx] 
> Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2009 8:27 PM
> To: Ken Bour
> Cc: Julie Hedlund
> Subject: Final response to the CCT
>  
> Ken,
>  
> Can you provide a final version of a proposed OSC response to the CCT?  In 
> response to my request for comments on your first draft response from OSC 
> members to the CCT recommendations, I believe we received comments from 
> Philip, Wolf, Ron, Vanda and Steve.  Did I miss anyone?
>  
> I am not sure it is safe to conclude that the OSC members who commented 
> approved the document with their comments so I think it is best to run a 
> final version by them one more time and ask for their approval, giving them 5 
> working days.  What do you think?
>  
> Chuck
> <OSC Summary Comments (DRAFT v3 REDLINE)- CCT Final Recommendations.doc><OSC 
> Summary Comments (DRAFT v3 REDLINE)- CCT Final Recommendations.doc>

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature