Re: [gnso-rap-dt] How AT&T handles copyright abuse complaints

[Roland Perry <roland@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

In message 
<BA9B882C2A9D214AAA45D340957A69EF104FB0F1D7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
, at 13:32:11 on Fri, 27 Mar 2009, Phil Corwin 
<pcorwin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes
> As one of the registrars pointed out in Mexico City, court and 
> administrative orders and legislative safe harbors such as the DMCA's 
> in the US provide a level of legal protection to common carriers and 
> ISPs that is not necessarily available to protect registrars against 
> litigation under ICANN contracts.
Is the answer to this for registrars to lobby to be immune from the 
misdeeds of their customers in the same way that "common carrier" ISPs 
are?
Immune until put on notice (and fail to act), obviously.
--
Roland Perry