Re: REMINDER FW: [gnso-rap-dt] For review - RAP WG Status Update

[Roland Perry <roland@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

In message <53EF607A5E494646A96C6F004D0CAC16@xxxxxxxxxxx>, at 11:13:38 
on Fri, 29 May 2009, Greg Aaron <gaaron@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes
> Hello, Roland.  I think that the statement is accurate -- it just says there
> consensus in group that we will use this working definition in the next
> phase of our work.  The statement is careful to note that it is a working
> definition and subject to additional work if we like.
This is probably a "glass half full/half empty" issue. It could be fixed 
by saying "...will be revisited should..."
> *       This is a working definition as per group consensus on April 27,
> 2009 and may be re-visited should the WG find it inadequate after
> examining some specific examples.
--
Roland Perry