[gnso-vi-feb10] Updated Draft VI Charter
Dear all, Attached is the updated draft charter that reflects the changes discussed in our call today and further developed over email. Brian Cute and I still need to further refine the definitions, but hopefully you can reach consensus on the language of the objectives. Best Regards, Margie _____________ Margie Milam Senior Policy Counselor ICANN ____________ -----Original Message----- From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 4:05 PM To: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] proposed rewording of Objective 5 - resend (sent during the meeting but from the wrong address and it was rejected) The friendly amendment: Using all information that has been collected by ICANN to date determine whether ... a. On 17 Feb 2010, at 13:46, Milton L Mueller wrote: > > > Objective 5: To determine whether the changes to the current restrictions > and/or practices concerning registry-registrar separation and equal access > contained in the options set out in DAGv3 constitute an unacceptable > deviation from current policies regarding registry-registrar sewparation. > > Rationale: this does not require research or an open-ended assessment of the > entire registry-registrar market, but a simple determination that the DAGv3 > proposals are an unauthorized policy change. > > --MM > Attachment:
VI DT Charter SVG V9.docx
|