RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] a question on the rack + proposal

["Kathy Kleiman" <kKleiman@xxxxxxx>]

+1 Tim; I've asked Mikey to revise the name and origin of our RACK proposal on 
the WG webpage. It is definitely a group effort.

Kathy Kleiman
Director of Policy
.ORG The Public Interest Registry
Direct: +1 703 889-5756  Mobile: +1 703 371-6846

Visit us online!
Check out events & blogs at .ORG Buzz!
Find us on Facebook | dotorg
See the .ORG Buzz! Photo Gallery on Flickr
See our video library on YouTube

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE:
Proprietary and confidential to .ORG, The Public Interest Registry.  If 
received in error, please inform sender and then delete.




-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Tim Ruiz
Sent: Sunday, June 13, 2010 10:15 AM
To: Sivasubramanian M
Cc: <Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] a question on the rack + proposal


Siva,

RACK+ is not a new name for the Afilias proposal. It is a completely new
proposal developed by Kathy, Brian, Ron, and myself.

Our intent with RACK+ is that a Registry Operator may also own and
operate the registry back-end, or they may use a third party service
provider for that, or any part of it (DNS, database, etc.). However,
they cannot use a service provider in which a registrar has more than
15% ownership.

Tim  
 
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [gnso-vi-feb10] a question on the rack + proposal
From: Sivasubramanian M <isolatedn@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, June 13, 2010 12:21 am
To: "<Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>" <Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>

Hello

The Affilias proposal now known as Rack +  proposes the following:

1. ICANN to permit 15% cross ownership between Registrars and Registries
2. ICANN to permit 15% cross ownership between Registrars and Registry
Back-end service providers

Between Registries and Registry Back-end services?  

Sivasubramanian M