RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] a question on the rack + proposal

["Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Siva,

RACK+ is not a new name for the Afilias proposal. It is a completely new
proposal developed by Kathy, Brian, Ron, and myself.

Our intent with RACK+ is that a Registry Operator may also own and
operate the registry back-end, or they may use a third party service
provider for that, or any part of it (DNS, database, etc.). However,
they cannot use a service provider in which a registrar has more than
15% ownership.

Tim  
 
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [gnso-vi-feb10] a question on the rack + proposal
From: Sivasubramanian M <isolatedn@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, June 13, 2010 12:21 am
To: "<Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>" <Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>

Hello

The Affilias proposal now known as Rack +  proposes the following:

1. ICANN to permit 15% cross ownership between Registrars and Registries
2. ICANN to permit 15% cross ownership between Registrars and Registry
Back-end service providers

Between Registries and Registry Back-end services?  

Sivasubramanian M