RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] DRAFT version of "atoms" survey

["Thomas Barrett - EnCirca" <tbarrett@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Mikey,

Very useful survey.  I think it would be beneficial to break out the .brand
answers into separate questions similar to the separate treatment for
.community.

I also think the .brand answers could have been genericized for the
questions they were contained in...for example:  "is it ok for a [not
.brand] registry to select just one or two registrars to distribute its
tld?"

Best regards,

Tom


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Mike O'Connor
Sent: Monday, June 14, 2010 5:14 PM
To: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-vi-feb10] DRAFT version of "atoms" survey


i've crunched out a draft version of an "atoms" survey based on the call
today.  i'm pasting a link to this draft survey that just lets you look at
the survey, but won't record your answers.  

        http://is.gd/cPh37  (it's shortened from a huge link that comes out
of SurveyMonkey)

did i mention "draft" enough times?  i would much appreciate a few people
taking a moment to run through this draft survey and offer ideas to
clarify/improve it.  i'll switch from "draft" to "real-survey" mode at the
end of the day tomorrow after working any ideas/improvements into it.

thanks,

mikey




- - - - - - - - -
phone   651-647-6109  
fax             866-280-2356  
web     www.haven2.com
handle  OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google,
etc.)