I support Option 3

["D.R. Productions NYC, LLC" <drprod@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

To Whom It May Concern:

As a former member of the adult entertainment industry. I support Option 
# 3 of the March 26, 2010 process options submitted by ICANN for public 
comment.
I do not support the creation of a .XXX sTLD, and believe that the ICANN 
Board was well within its rights to deny ICM's application in the 2007 
Board meeting in Lisbon. The issue, as the ICANN Board has realized 
every time in the past, is "What is the actual benefit?" Unless the .XXX 
domain is */required/* it simply becomes a "come-on" for unscrupulous 
sites, and makes censorship easier in countries with long policies of 
crushing citizens' freedom like China - and if you require certain sites 
to carry the .XXX domain, that will immediately turn into ICANN becoming 
a /de facto/ censor itself, having to make content decisions that, to be 
honest, ICANN has never shown any ability or desire to make.
Regardless of the option chosen, I ask that ICANN continue to consider 
the widespread opposition of the sponsored community in any further 
decisions concerning a .XXX sTLD,
Sincerely,
D.R. Darke
former owner of agentsofbound.com and 70sbound.com