ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[pdp-pcceg-feb06]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [pdp-pcceg-feb06] GNSO PDP Feb 06: Proposed Work Plan

  • To: PDPfeb06 <pdp-pcceg-feb06@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [pdp-pcceg-feb06] GNSO PDP Feb 06: Proposed Work Plan
  • From: Mawaki Chango <ki_chango@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 22:11:12 -0700 (PDT)

Liz,

Me again... to correct an oversight. About the "impact on onstituency
analysis" - this was in fact the point I wanted to make on the last
call, but there was a problem with the line. As I understand the
related bylaws sections, d.1.iv and e.3, it's about anlyzing "how the
issue would affect the constituency." Allow me to provide you with my
view, since we are running out of time.

Though a few individual NCUC members may have business in the realm
of ICANN activities, at one level or another, this seems far to be a
largely shared feature of our members, and thus, could not define how
the constituency as a whole would be affected by the outcome of the
issue at hand. Rather our deliberations are often articulated around
what we perceive to be in the public interest and for the respect
and/or the improvement of individuals' rights (that's what I've seen
and understood so far). This appears in the rationale or reasoning in
our statement, since we have to, and do justify or explain our
position in such statements.

Therefore, we may not have much to add in a separate note or section,
to address this question - unless we conduct a survey, or a review
(of the kind of the one the LSE's just done of the GNSO) to find out
about how the business of each individual member organization would
be impacted by the issue, which, I believe, would be way much heavier
than what is being requested here.

So, if you accept this response, I state that to the best of my
knowledge, NCUC has no further input to submit for inclusion in the
next iteration of the TF Preliminary report. 

Thank you,

Mawaki


--- Liz Williams <liz.williams@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Colleagues
> 
> I have set out below my understanding of where the group had  
> agreement from yesterday's call.  During the call, no motions were 
> 
> agreed and the minutes will only reflect tentative discussions.
> 
> Work plan
> 
> 16 August 2006:  Final edits to be sent on Preliminary Taskforce  
> Report.  Please include "impact on constituency analysis" and
> please  
> provide specific text change suggestions.
> 
> 16 August 2006:  Final deadline for submission of suggestions for  
> expert materials
> 
> 23 August 2006:  Distribution of expert materials for consideration
>  
> by the TF
> 
> 21 September 2006:  Proposed date for next teleconference - agenda 
> 
> will be sent 7 days prior to the call.  Call designed to discuss  
> expert materials and impact on drafting of Preliminary Taskforce  
> Report.  Note that this is after the already scheduled Amsterdam  
> meetings and after the regular GNSO Council call on 14 September.
> 
> 28 September 2006:  Release completed  Preliminary Taskforce Report
>  
> and begin 20 day public comment period
> 
> 10 October 2006:  Public comment period closes
> 
> 20 October 2006:  Release of Final Report to GNSO Council -- please
>  
> note section 10 of PDP guidelines which refers to Council  
> deliberation and, if the Council chooses, hearing of expert
> advisors
> 
> 30 October 2006:  GNSO Council meets to discuss Final Report.   
> Incorporation of any final commentary.
> 
> 3 November 2006:  Release of Board Report.
> 
> Note that these dates reflect the PDP guidelines as they stand.
> 
> I would appreciate a formal motion being passed to agree this  
> schedule.  This can be done by email.  Note section 11 of the
> current  
> PDP guidelines that require minuting of all decisions for  
> incorporation into the Board Report.
> 
> In addition, I would also appreciate a motion that would approve
> the  
> minutes of the previous call -- please consult those minutes if you
>  
> were present at the meeting so that you can vote to accept those  
> minutes before our next teleconference.
> 
> Of course, any questions or comments, let me know.
> 
> Liz
> 
> .....................................................
> 
> Liz Williams
> Senior Policy Counselor
> ICANN - Brussels
> +32 2 234 7874 tel
> +32 2 234 7848 fax
> +32 497 07 4243 mob
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy