Re: [soac-mapo] Final Rec 6 CWG Charter

[Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>]

True, some on the Council think it is an impossible date, but others don't.

It cannot be said that the GNSO Council recognized this as an impossible 
target. That is just not true.

Stéphane

Le 27 août 2010 à 17:56, Alan Greenberg a écrit :

> I note that at the GNSO meeting yesterday, there was a discussion about the 
> sentence in Operational Guidelines & Timeline that says:
> 
> "The Rec6 CWG should deliver a report with comments from the ALAC, GAC and 
> GNSO Council not later than 13 September 2010 to meet the 11-day advance 
> publication that the Board requests for its retreat on new gTLDs."
> 
> It was generally accepted that this timeline is not at all possible, since we 
> will have to work rather hard to get a report out for that date, but there 
> would be no time for each SO/AC to formally incorporate their comments in 
> that time-frame. There was some discussion that it could be reworded to say 
> the report was due by the 13th and the SO/ACc would deliver comments after 
> that date. However, most at the meeting were willing to just leave the words 
> along, even though it was recognized as an impossible target. 
> 
> Alan
> 
> At 27/08/2010 11:23 AM, Liz Gasster wrote:
>> All,
>>  
>> The final CWG Charter is attached for your reference.
>>  
>> Best, Liz
>>