Re: [soac-mapo] Final Rec 6 CWG Charter

[Antony Van Couvering <avc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I do not accept that this timeline is not possible.  I was not the only one. 

On Aug 27, 2010, at 11:56 AM, Alan Greenberg wrote:

> I note that at the GNSO meeting yesterday, there was a discussion about the 
> sentence in Operational Guidelines & Timeline that says:
> 
> "The Rec6 CWG should deliver a report with comments from the ALAC, GAC and 
> GNSO Council not later than 13 September 2010 to meet the 11-day advance 
> publication that the Board requests for its retreat on new gTLDs."
> 
> It was generally accepted that this timeline is not at all possible, since we 
> will have to work rather hard to get a report out for that date, but there 
> would be no time for each SO/AC to formally incorporate their comments in 
> that time-frame. There was some discussion that it could be reworded to say 
> the report was due by the 13th and the SO/ACc would deliver comments after 
> that date. However, most at the meeting were willing to just leave the words 
> along, even though it was recognized as an impossible target. 
> 
> Alan
> 
> At 27/08/2010 11:23 AM, Liz Gasster wrote:
>> All,
>>  
>> The final CWG Charter is attached for your reference.
>>  
>> Best, Liz
>>