FW: [soac-mapo] Which terminology needs review?
In response to Avri's request, please note the attached definitions for terms used in the implementation plan for Recommendation 6. Thanks to Kurt for following up on this. Chuck -----Original Message----- From: Kurt Pritz [mailto:kurt.pritz@xxxxxxxxx] Sent: Friday, August 27, 2010 6:04 PM To: Gomes, Chuck Cc: David Olive Subject: Re: [soac-mapo] Which terminology needs review? Chuck: We developed the following response to the request for definitions. You will see that we indicate where we think the definitions exist in the published literature. You will also see that we chose not to provide definitions for some terms. I hope this is helpful to the group. Regards, Kurt Attachment:
M&PO-Terminology.doc On Aug 26, 2010, at 12:16 PM, Gomes, Chuck wrote: > Kurt, > > Is this something that someone from your team could respond to? How is > it going regarding the possibility of Amy joining the CWG? > > Chuck > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx] On > Behalf Of Avri Doria > Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 10:20 AM > To: soac-mapo > Subject: [soac-mapo] Which terminology needs review? > > > Hi, > > Since I caused such a mess with my procedural issue in the ToR, I figure > i should take a plunge toward the substantive issues. > > The ToR states that our purpose is: > >> 1. Review the terminology and the dispute resolution procedures > related to recommendation 6 in the new gTLD Draft Applicant Guidebook, > version 4. (For convenience, relevant excerpts of the guidebook are > included in Appendix A and a flow chart of the dispute process in > included in Appendix B.) > > What terminology do we mean to review? > > In looking at the excerpt in A, I find the following terms/phrases that > seem to require some common understanding: > > - Morality and Public Order > - Objection > - generally accepted legal norms > - general principles of international law > - inclusive standing base > - "quick look" procedure > - frivolous and/or abusive objections > - manifestly unfounded > - abuse of the right to object > - "highly objectionable" gTLD applications > - right to freedom of expression, > - special duties and responsibilities. > - certain limited restrictions > - Incitement to > - promotion of > - violent lawless action > - discrimination based upon ... > - child pornography > - sexual abuse of children > > I am not sure If I captured too many, or whether I missed some. > > I am sure the definitions are obvious to most of us. I also expect that > those obvious definitions differ somewhat. > > I have my own understanding of all of these. But as opposed to all of > us starting to give our understanding of the list (or some other more > appropriate list) I wonder whether the Implementation Team in its > initial work with the DRSP (International Chambers of Commerce) has > already worked on definitions for some of these word/phrases. If so, it > might be better to start with that - what does the implementation mean > by all of these? > > thanks > a. > > |