ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[soac-mapo]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [soac-mapo] Note of GAC position on paying for objections

  • To: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>, soac-mapo <soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [soac-mapo] Note of GAC position on paying for objections
  • From: Milton L Mueller <mueller@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2010 12:05:12 -0400

If the purpose of fees is to eliminate frivolous objections, it seems to be 
clear that a fee should be charged upon filing of the objection, and thus 
before any evaluation process. The quick-look criteria should be available to 
those filing objections to help them avoid wasting their money. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Avri Doria
> Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 11:30 AM
> To: soac-mapo
> Subject: Re: [soac-mapo] Note of GAC position on paying for objections
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Another question occurs to me about fees.
> 
> Would a fee need to be paid (and by objector and applicant?) before the
> quick look, or only after the quick look.
> 
> a.
> 





<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy