ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[soac-mapo]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[soac-mapo] RE: The use of the Centre of Expertise of the ICC as the DRSP

  • To: "Konstantinos Komaitis" <k.komaitis@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "soac-mapo" <soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [soac-mapo] RE: The use of the Centre of Expertise of the ICC as the DRSP
  • From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2010 15:02:17 -0400

Thanks Konstantinos.  I encourage everyone to comment on this before our
meeting tomorrow.

Chuck

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Konstantinos Komaitis [mailto:k.komaitis@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2010 1:30 PM
> To: Gomes, Chuck; soac-mapo
> Subject: The use of the Centre of Expertise of the ICC as the DRSP
> 
> Dear all,
> 
> Please find attached a very draft statement and recommendation on the
> 'use of the center of expertise of the ICC as the DRSP'. Considering
> that this topic has not been discussed as of yet (I think it in the
> list of tomorrow's call), there were not many views expressed on this
> issue by the group - actually I can only recall a couple.
> I apologize in advance if I have misunderstood or misinterpreted
> anyone's view on this issue or I have left someone's points out of
this
> document (I did not have time to refer to the mp3).
> 
> Most probably I will be in tomorrow's call but I might be a bit late.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> KK
> 
> 
> On 08/09/2010 18:23, "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> In our Rec6 CWG meeting today, it was suggested that I call for
> volunteers who might be willing to draft a possible recommendation or
> statement regarding the remaining discussion threads:
> 
> *       Use of the term 'incitement'
> 
> *       Quick Look procedure
> 
> *       Use of the Center of Expertise of the ICC as the DRSP
> 
> *       Independent Objector
> 
> *       Timing of Rec6 Dispute Resolution
> 
> *       Incitement to discrimination criterion
> 
> There are a couple other threads not included that volunteers already
> agreed to work on.
> 
> If you are willing to volunteer for one or more of these, I would
> suggest that you draft a recommendation and/or statement that attempts
> to accommodate multiple views expressed in the CWG and not just your
> own.  Please submit any drafts you are willing to prepare by end of
the
> day on Thursday so that we can discuss them on the list and in our
> meeting on Friday.  Our goal will be to try to discuss all remaining
> threads on Friday.
> 
> Thanks, Chuck





<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy