Re: [soac-mapo] Draft Rec for "Incitement" (for Summary of Issues/Recommendations)

[Richard Tindal <richardtindal@xxxxxx>]

I think Mary has captured the group discussion accurately.   It's also a well 
written note.

MARGIE --  Where Avri is listed for her views would you please list me as well. 
  I share her incitement propensity.  

RT


On Sep 9, 2010, at 3:25 PM, Gomes, Chuck wrote:

> Thanks Mary.  I encourage comments and discussion of this.
> 
> Chuck
> 
>  
> 
> From: owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf 
> Of Mary Wong
> Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2010 6:01 PM
> To: soac-mapo
> Subject: [soac-mapo] Draft Rec for "Incitement" (for Summary of 
> Issues/Recommendations)
>  
> 
> I agree, and note that Richard used the phrase "Principles of Ordre Publique" 
> in an earlier email. I've adopted it in the attached draft recommendation on 
> the use of the term "incitement" (and thank Konstantinos for starting the 
> draft and dredging up the various emails concerning the issue!)
>  
> I've also used the same font as Margie, in the hope it will facilitate 
> editing and insertion.
>  
> Something on Quick Look to follow, shortly .... (I hope :)
>  
> Cheers
> Mary 
>  
> Mary W S Wong
> Professor of Law
> Chair, Graduate IP Programs
> UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SCHOOL OF LAW
> Two White Street
> Concord, NH 03301
> USA
> Email: mary.wong@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Phone: 1-603-513-5143
> Webpage: http://www.law.unh.edu/marywong/index.php
> Selected writings available on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) at: 
> http://ssrn.com/author=437584
> 
> 
> >>>
> From:
> Konstantinos Komaitis <k.komaitis@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To:
> Margie Milam <Margie.Milam@xxxxxxxxx>, soac-mapo <soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date:
> 9/9/2010 5:55 PM
> Subject:
> Re: [soac-mapo] Summary of Issues/Recommendations
> 
> Dear Margie,
> 
> Thanks for this, it is really helpful.
> 
> One point - I think we decided at this point to use the term 'ordre publique' 
> and abandon the term 'public interest' when it comes to objections. I think 
> 'ordre publique' came out of our discussion with Carroll and it is something 
> that Mary also suggested (?).
> 
> Thanks
> 
> KK
> 
> 
> On 09/09/2010 19:33, "Margie Milam" <Margie.Milam@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Dear All,
> 
> Please find enclosed for your review suggested language that summarizes the 
> topics discussed and the proposed recommendations.  Although some of you are 
> working on language to insert in this document, I thought this might serve as 
> a starting point for you.
> 
> It is very difficult to glean all of the details from the email list, so 
> please accept my apologies if I misstated the principles or the 
> recommendations.   Also,  there are areas where I was unable to sketch an 
> outline of the issue or proposed recommendation, such as the Quick Look 
> Procedure, Timing of Rec6 Dispute, and Guidebook Criterion 4.  Hopefully 
> volunteers can assist in describing the issue and proposed resolution.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Margie
> 
> 
> 
>  
>  
> As of August 30, 2010, Franklin Pierce Law Center has affiliated with the 
> University of New Hampshire and is now known as the University of New 
> Hampshire School of Law. Please note that all email addresses have changed 
> and now follow the convention:firstname.lastname@xxxxxxxxxxx. For more 
> information on the University of New Hampshire School of Law, please visit 
> law.unh.edu