RE: [soac-mapo] Draft Rec for "Incitement" (for Summary of Issues/Recommendations)

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Did I misunderstand the statement/recommendation drafted by Mary?  I
didn't understand that it recommended that the term 'incitement' be
removed but rather that the term 'promotion' be removed: " The term
"promotion" should be removed from the AGB. (Mary Wong)"

If we removed both terms, wouldn't we be eliminating all three
categories?  Is that the intent?

Chuck

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Konstantinos Komaitis
> Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2010 6:21 PM
> To: Mary Wong; soac-mapo
> Subject: Re: [soac-mapo] Draft Rec for "Incitement" (for Summary of
> Issues/Recommendations)
> 
> 
> Thanks Mary for this. I agree - 'incitement' is an unfit term for this
> process and is used erroneously. I support the recommendation for the
> term to be removed.
> 
> 
> KK
> 
> 
> On 09/09/2010 23:01, "Mary Wong" <Mary.Wong@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> I agree, and note that Richard used the phrase "Principles of Ordre
> Publique" in an earlier email. I've adopted it in the attached draft
> recommendation on the use of the term "incitement" (and thank
> Konstantinos for starting the draft and dredging up the various emails
> concerning the issue!)
> 
> I've also used the same font as Margie, in the hope it will facilitate
> editing and insertion.
> 
> Something on Quick Look to follow, shortly .... (I hope :)
> 
> Cheers
> Mary
> 
> Mary W S Wong
> Professor of Law
> Chair, Graduate IP Programs
> UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SCHOOL OF LAW Two White Street Concord, NH
> 03301 USA Email: mary.wong@xxxxxxxxxxx Phone: 1-603-513-5143 Webpage:
> http://www.law.unh.edu/marywong/index.php Selected writings available
> on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) at:
> http://ssrn.com/author=437584
> 
> >>>
> From: Konstantinos Komaitis <k.komaitis@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: Margie Milam <Margie.Milam@xxxxxxxxx>, soac-mapo <soac-
> mapo@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: 9/9/2010 5:55 PM
> Subject: Re: [soac-mapo] Summary of Issues/Recommendations
> Dear Margie,
> 
> Thanks for this, it is really helpful.
> 
> One point - I think we decided at this point to use the term 'ordre
> publique' and abandon the term 'public interest' when it comes to
> objections. I think 'ordre publique' came out of our discussion with
> Carroll and it is something that Mary also suggested (?).
> 
> Thanks
> 
> KK
> 
> 
> On 09/09/2010 19:33, "Margie Milam" <Margie.Milam@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Dear All,
> 
> Please find enclosed for your review suggested language that
summarizes
> the topics discussed and the proposed recommendations.  Although some
> of you are working on language to insert in this document, I thought
> this might serve as a starting point for you.
> 
> It is very difficult to glean all of the details from the email list,
> so please accept my apologies if I misstated the principles or the
> recommendations.   Also,  there are areas where I was unable to sketch
> an outline of the issue or proposed recommendation, such as the Quick
> Look Procedure, Timing of Rec6 Dispute, and Guidebook Criterion 4.
> Hopefully volunteers can assist in describing the issue and proposed
> resolution.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Margie
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  As of August 30, 2010, Franklin Pierce Law  Center has affiliated
with
> the University of New Hampshire and is now  known as the University of
> New Hampshire School of Law. Please  note that all email addresses
have
> changed and now follow the  convention:
firstname.lastname@xxxxxxxxxxx.
> For more information on the University  of New Hampshire School of
Law,
> please  visit law.unh.edu <http://law.unh.edu>
>