ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[soac-mapo]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [soac-mapo] Draft Rec for "Incitement" (for Summary of Issues/Recommendations)

  • To: soac-mapo <soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [soac-mapo] Draft Rec for "Incitement" (for Summary of Issues/Recommendations)
  • From: Richard Tindal <richardtindal@xxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2010 15:44:24 -0700

OK,  maybe it didn't read as well as I thought.

I saw it simply a statement of various views - and not as a hard recommendation.

Mary - could you clarify?

RT


On Sep 9, 2010, at 3:35 PM, Gomes, Chuck wrote:

> 
> Did I misunderstand the statement/recommendation drafted by Mary?  I
> didn't understand that it recommended that the term 'incitement' be
> removed but rather that the term 'promotion' be removed: " The term
> "promotion" should be removed from the AGB. (Mary Wong)"
> 
> If we removed both terms, wouldn't we be eliminating all three
> categories?  Is that the intent?
> 
> Chuck
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx] On
>> Behalf Of Konstantinos Komaitis
>> Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2010 6:21 PM
>> To: Mary Wong; soac-mapo
>> Subject: Re: [soac-mapo] Draft Rec for "Incitement" (for Summary of
>> Issues/Recommendations)
>> 
>> 
>> Thanks Mary for this. I agree - 'incitement' is an unfit term for this
>> process and is used erroneously. I support the recommendation for the
>> term to be removed.
>> 
>> 
>> KK
>> 
>> 
>> On 09/09/2010 23:01, "Mary Wong" <Mary.Wong@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> 
>> I agree, and note that Richard used the phrase "Principles of Ordre
>> Publique" in an earlier email. I've adopted it in the attached draft
>> recommendation on the use of the term "incitement" (and thank
>> Konstantinos for starting the draft and dredging up the various emails
>> concerning the issue!)
>> 
>> I've also used the same font as Margie, in the hope it will facilitate
>> editing and insertion.
>> 
>> Something on Quick Look to follow, shortly .... (I hope :)
>> 
>> Cheers
>> Mary
>> 
>> Mary W S Wong
>> Professor of Law
>> Chair, Graduate IP Programs
>> UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SCHOOL OF LAW Two White Street Concord, NH
>> 03301 USA Email: mary.wong@xxxxxxxxxxx Phone: 1-603-513-5143 Webpage:
>> http://www.law.unh.edu/marywong/index.php Selected writings available
>> on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) at:
>> http://ssrn.com/author=437584
>> 
>>>>> 
>> From: Konstantinos Komaitis <k.komaitis@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> To: Margie Milam <Margie.Milam@xxxxxxxxx>, soac-mapo <soac-
>> mapo@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Date: 9/9/2010 5:55 PM
>> Subject: Re: [soac-mapo] Summary of Issues/Recommendations
>> Dear Margie,
>> 
>> Thanks for this, it is really helpful.
>> 
>> One point - I think we decided at this point to use the term 'ordre
>> publique' and abandon the term 'public interest' when it comes to
>> objections. I think 'ordre publique' came out of our discussion with
>> Carroll and it is something that Mary also suggested (?).
>> 
>> Thanks
>> 
>> KK
>> 
>> 
>> On 09/09/2010 19:33, "Margie Milam" <Margie.Milam@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> 
>> Dear All,
>> 
>> Please find enclosed for your review suggested language that
> summarizes
>> the topics discussed and the proposed recommendations.  Although some
>> of you are working on language to insert in this document, I thought
>> this might serve as a starting point for you.
>> 
>> It is very difficult to glean all of the details from the email list,
>> so please accept my apologies if I misstated the principles or the
>> recommendations.   Also,  there are areas where I was unable to sketch
>> an outline of the issue or proposed recommendation, such as the Quick
>> Look Procedure, Timing of Rec6 Dispute, and Guidebook Criterion 4.
>> Hopefully volunteers can assist in describing the issue and proposed
>> resolution.
>> 
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Margie
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> As of August 30, 2010, Franklin Pierce Law  Center has affiliated
> with
>> the University of New Hampshire and is now  known as the University of
>> New Hampshire School of Law. Please  note that all email addresses
> have
>> changed and now follow the  convention:
> firstname.lastname@xxxxxxxxxxx.
>> For more information on the University  of New Hampshire School of
> Law,
>> please  visit law.unh.edu <http://law.unh.edu>
>> 
> 
> 




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy