RE: [soac-mapo] Cartagena session on Rec 6

[<Heather.Dryden@xxxxxxxx>]

It's true.  I did ask that this session not be held when GAC is in
session.
 
Heather

________________________________

From: owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Cheryl Langdon-Orr
Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 10:50 AM
To: Gomes, Chuck
Cc: Mary Wong; soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [soac-mapo] Cartagena session on Rec 6


Same here and I also gather same for Heather....of note as well is that
Heather  said to Chuck and I when this issue wsa first raised, that
while she also has no details she DID specifically request that any such
meeting NOT clash with GAC meeting / session commitments => Huge SIGH 

Cheryl Langdon-Orr
(CLO)




On 1 December 2010 02:30, Gomes, Chuck <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


        I have not seen anthing about the Wednesday session except what
is on the ICANN meeting schedule.

        Chuck

         

        From: owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mary Wong
        Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 10:21 AM
        To: soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx
        Subject: [soac-mapo] Cartagena session on Rec 6

         

        Has there been any further information on the above session,
scheduled for Wednesday 8 December at 11 a.m. (e.g. panelists,
moderator, scope etc.)?

         

        Unfortunately - particularly in the context of our recent
discussion over the likelihood of any GAC comment on this group's
recommendations - it's being held at exactly the same time as the GAC
discussion of new gTLDs and the AGB :(

         

        BTW, my thanks to Frank and Bertrand for their thoughts on the
GAC issue. Like I said, I understood that the CWG Rec 6 proposals were
not ones endorsed by the GAC and that they were not participating in the
group either as GAC delegates or officially of their respective
governments. Nonetheless, since the GAC had expressed support for the
CWG concept and mandate, it is unfortunate that GAC communications on
the issue since then have not acknowledged or referred to the existence
of the CWG recommendations. 

         

        Since the AGB, including, specifically, Rec 6, is on the GAC
agenda for Cartagena, I hope that some consideration will be given to
the CWG recommendations during the discussions.

         

        Cheers, and safe travels to those heading out to Cartagena,

        Mary 

         

         

        Mary W S Wong

        Professor of Law

        Chair, Graduate IP Programs

        UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SCHOOL OF LAW
        Two White Street
        Concord, NH 03301
        USA
        Email: mary.wong@xxxxxxxxxxx
        Phone: 1-603-513-5143
        Webpage: http://www.law.unh.edu/marywong/index.php
        Selected writings available on the Social Science Research
Network (SSRN) at: http://ssrn.com/author=437584

         

         

        As of August 30, 2010, Franklin Pierce Law Center has affiliated
with the University of New Hampshire and is now known as the University
of New Hampshire School of Law. Please note that all email addresses
have changed and now follow the convention:
firstname.lastname@xxxxxxxxxxx. For more information on the University
of New Hampshire School of Law, please visit law.unh.edu
<http://law.unh.edu>