[soac-mapo] Updated Letter
<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><div>Rec6 CWG Colleagues:</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks for everyone's time on today's call. Attached are redline and clean versions of the proposed letter to the Board. Please review and let the group know if you have any changes/substantive objections. We always have the option -- as we discussed on the call -- to append any objections from group members if they so desire. </div><div><br></div><div>Please also take a close look at the last paragraph of the letter related to the name of the Rec6 objections. This came out of our final few minutes on the call. For one, I probably would delete this paragraph. It seems a bit petty and not all that helpful, but I don't feel strongly enough by any means to append an objection on it. I found an e-mail from Marika on September 13th with the following poll results, which I think somewhat weakens some of the points made on the call:</div><div><br></div><div><!--StartFragment--> <div style="border-top-style: none; border-right-style: none; border-left-style: none; border-width: initial; border-color: initial; border-bottom-style: solid; border-bottom-color: windowtext; border-bottom-width: 1.5pt; padding-top: 0in; padding-right: 0in; padding-bottom: 0in; padding-left: 0in; position: static; z-index: auto; "><p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:normal;border:none;mso-border-bottom-alt: solid windowtext 1.5pt;padding:0in;mso-padding-alt:0in 0in 0in 0in"><span class="apple-style-span">a. "Objections Based on the Principles of Ordre Public": 7/20</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:normal;border:none;mso-border-bottom-alt: solid windowtext 1.5pt;padding:0in;mso-padding-alt:0in 0in 0in 0in"><span class="apple-style-span">b. "Public Order Objections": 0/20</span><span class="apple-style-span"><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:normal;border:none;mso-border-bottom-alt: solid windowtext 1.5pt;padding:0in;mso-padding-alt:0in 0in 0in 0in"><span class="apple-style-span">c. "Public Interest Objections"</span><span class="apple-style-span">: 8/20</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:normal;border:none;mso-border-bottom-alt: solid windowtext 1.5pt;padding:0in;mso-padding-alt:0in 0in 0in 0in"><span class="apple-style-span">d. "Objections Based on General Principles of International Law':</span><span class="apple-style-span"> 14/20<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:normal;border:none;mso-border-bottom-alt: solid windowtext 1.5pt;padding:0in;mso-padding-alt:0in 0in 0in 0in"><span class="apple-style-span">e. “</span>Objections based on the General Principles of Ordre Public or International Law”: 9/20</p></div></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>As discussed, we are trying to have Chuck send the letter to the Board in the next 24 hours to meet the Board's deadline.</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks again.</div><div><br></div><div>Best,</div><div><br></div><div>Jon</div><div><br></div><div><br></div></body></html> Attachment:
Rec6 CWG Draft Response Clean 010611.doc <html><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><head></head></body></html> Attachment:
Rec6 CWG Draft Response 010611.doc <html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "></body></html>
|