Only today, June 5th 2000, I got my pin.
This confirms to me that scheduling was
more
than tight. I definitely agree with
all those suggesting a rescheduling.There
being no more time for discussion,
I'd still like to state that I share most
of
the feelings expressed about the nominating
and election procedures looking flawed
(if not
even biased) and needing some qualitative
and quantitative correction.
I
especially remark that the At Large Membership,
being thought as a means of representation
for
the "common" internet-users, should not insist
too much on procedural complications
devised to
get *only top-people*: common-sense could get
lost.