Return to tldapps Forum - Message Thread - FAQ
  
    | Username: | olihillel | 
  
    | Date/Time: | Thu, October 19, 2000 at 8:52 AM GMT | 
  
    | Browser: | Microsoft Internet Explorer V4.01 using Windows 95 | 
  
    | Score: | 5 | 
  
    | Subject: | .geo and SUSTAINABLE tourism | 
  
    | Message:
 |  | 
  
    | 
 | 
 | Hello! Having recently
heard about SRI's proposal to ICANN to create a .geo domain, I wanted to comment
that I believe that it would be a great tool for:* well-informed and discriminating
travelers that want to select exciting destinations in particular areas, or plan
their trips. As the number of experienced travelers increases, .geo will be an essential
support system for better and wiser traveling. Imagine a combination of an universal
and ever-updating travel guide and a map as detailed as you'd like! It could make
it easier for them to find small- and medium-sized enterprises that may have less
chance of becoming members of mega-Web travel portals. This would also enhance the
distribution of benefits to local populations. It also seems to me that by giving
each posting a geographical reference, we increase the information provider's accountability
and responsibility.
 * researchers wanting to correlate geo-referenced information
to data on tourism and the environment ( both cultural and natural) - such as UNEP,
for instance.
 For these reasons, I would like to fully support SRI's proposal,
and look forward to using .geo in the near future.  Oliver HillelTourism Programme
Coordinator
 United Nations Environment Programme
 Division of Technology, Industry
and Economics
 ( the opinions expressed in this e-mail are personal, and do not
reflect the views of the UN system, UNEP or its divisions)      
 
 
 
 | 
 | 
 | 
Message Thread:
  - .geo Application by SRI International   Moderator, October 7 @ 10:22 PM (23/28)
    - Letter of Support   cgshepard, November 6 @ 12:31 AM (0/0)
- SRI Comments regarding dot-geo   dot-geo, November 6 @ 12:03 AM (0/0)
- Is this TLD really needed?   sking, November 5 @ 10:09 PM (0/0)
- the dot-geo and its potential positive effects   Spaceman, November 5 @ 9:53 PM (0/0)
- Technical and Institutional Reservations concerning .geo   kottman, November 4 @ 9:20 PM (0/0)
- Support for .Geo Proposal   LStephens, November 4 @ 7:03 PM (0/0)
- Policy Questions About dot.geo   jmoeller, November 3 @ 8:21 PM (0/0)
- Towards Transparency:  Figuring Out the Corporate Parentage & Value Proposition of Dot.Geo   Bruce Cahan, November 3 @ 5:37 PM (0/0)
- A GIS ezine looks at .geo   Adena, November 2 @ 10:32 PM (0/0)
- .geo plus .i = ?   adoyle, October 31 @ 8:23 PM (0/0)
- Doubts about .geo TLD   ddnebert, October 30 @ 4:33 PM (0/0)
- Web3D Consortium supports .geo   neiltrevett, October 29 @ 6:32 AM (0/0)
- .geo and education   BlackLineFish, October 26 @ 10:43 PM (0/0)
- Letter of support   dimo, October 26 @ 10:49 AM (0/0)
- Sri's .geo app   peniel, October 25 @ 11:55 PM (0/0)
- Letter of Support   WSchwaderer, October 25 @ 3:07 PM (0/0)
- Criticism of the SRI .geo proposal   steve_l, October 24 @ 6:11 AM (0/0)
- Support for .geo by X3D & NPS   brutzman, October 19 @ 4:45 PM (0/0)
- Digital Earth comment on .geo   Percivall, October 19 @ 2:30 PM (1/1)
- Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community   Pistoff, October 18 @ 6:07 PM (0/0)
- .geo Application by SRI International   rhyne, October 18 @ 11:14 AM (0/0)
- .geo & e-tourism   jachia, October 17 @ 2:21 PM (0/0)
- .geo application web site at www.dotgeo.org   Martin, October 14 @ 12:24 AM (1/4)
      - .geo   aeta, October 16 @ 5:20 PM (1/3)
        - .geo and SUSTAINABLE tourism   olihillel, October 19 @ 8:52 AM (1/2)
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy