Return to tldreport Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username:	cambler
Date/Time:	Sun, November 12, 2000 at 8:57 PM GMT (Sun, November 12, 2000 at 12:57 AM PST)
Browser:	Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.5 using Windows 98
Score:	5
Subject:	Proofs of claims
Message:
Kristopher is absolutely correct. All claims should be well backed-up. Just like the claims in the ICANN staff report which are simple opinion and have had their background facts disproven. Just like each and every post on this board that questions our financial and technical capacity - not a single one of which has even the least amount of technical or financial evidence to support the opinion. I ask again, where did we miss? Where don't we "get it?" What's specifically wrong with our application? The answer is nothing. Our technical numbers are within 5% of other applications that received praise, and the numbers quoted in the staff report just don't agree with the application and the facts. I believe, in the end, the ICANN board will be fair and realize this. I have to believe that. Christopher Ambler Christopher Ambler CTO, Image Online Design, Inc. The .Web Internet Domain Registry http://webtld.com

Message Thread:

• IOD's huge merits, that Afilias can only dream of — fabrcop, November 11 @ 5:16 PM (1/22)
• ... that's why generic Internet users support IOD — fabrcop, November 11 @ 5:28 PM (1/21)
• What a joke! — kristopher, November 12 @ 6:56 AM (4/20)
• Sir you may want to check up on Tucows... — Gregory W. Krajewski, November 12 @ 11:40 PM (0/0)
• please understand the magnitude of this - it's not IOD vs ICANN — sunshine, November 12 @ 2:02 PM (0/0)
• I may be a "funny guy" as you say, but I am still the "generic Internet user" — fabrcop, November 12 @ 8:27 AM (1/11)
• Statistics — kristopher, November 12 @ 8:47 AM (1/10)
• Sorry, I am a physicist, so I am supposed to know statistics very well... — fabrcop, November 12 @ 9:09 AM (2/9)
• You prove my point! — kristopher, November 12 @ 9:45 AM (1/3)
• Final answer — fabrcop, November 12 @ 9:59 AM (1/2)
• "I think that this forum is NOT a biased sample" — kristopher, November 12 @ 10:19 AM (1/1)
• Proofs of claims — cambler, November 12 @ 8:57 PM (0/0)
• Rough evaluation — fabrcop, November 12 @ 9:29 AM (1/4)
• You are a funny guy! — kristopher, November 12 @ 10:06 AM (1/3)
• Assumptions — fabrcop, November 12 @ 10:30 AM (1/2)
• *sigh* — kristopher, November 12 @ 10:43 AM (1/1)
• You're so right! — cambler, November 12 @ 2:02 PM (0/0)
• Sir, you're mistaken — cambler, November 12 @ 7:35 AM (1/5)
• No, no, no — kristopher, November 12 @ 7:55 AM (2/4)
• Thats the point — Anthony 2nd, November 12 @ 5:47 PM (0/0)
• No? — cambler, November 12 @ 1:37 PM (1/2)
• What if... — kristopher, November 12 @ 8:20 PM (1/1)
• Yes, what if... — cambler, November 12 @ 9:00 PM (0/0)

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy