> You want to make the decision "before a real discussion about possible errors"
emerges? That seems quite undemocratic and thus contrary to the aims of ICANN.
<But how do you know what they will make possibly false? The caucasus has been
mentioned, yeah, but what if they put something completely wrong, which noone has
ever thought of? And if you do not think of it, how can you discuss about it?
I
say that they have to release an alpha-version of a country-2-regions list, so one
everyone can have a look what maybe wrong.
That's democracy - you have to get the
proper information, before you can discuss about something.