[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Copy of comments...

You wrote:

>The Ronda Hauben Proposal:

>I have given some study to the proposal submitted by Ronda Hauben,
>although I admit that not to the level of attention I have devoted
>to the others. This is because it became clear, upon first reading,
>that this document is a significant departure from the approach
>taken by the others, calling for additional study and work before a
>final draft could even be contemplated.

>I believe that the White Paper process has already consumed far too
>many resources to be reset in the way proposed and would encourage
>its author to join into the final consensus-building process needed
>to merge the IANA, BWG and ORSC drafts. Any other course of action
>is, in my opinion, unacceptable given the history and potential for
>future conflict that such an approach would likely engender.

Would you please explain and give examples of what types of conflict
would arise from the Hauben proposal?

I have been discussing several of the Hauben proposals with Ms. Hauben
and several other interested parties on the netizens@columbia.edu
mailing list, and several usenet newsgroups that focus on DNS-related
issues, such as comp.protocols.tcp-ip.domains, net.internet.dns.policy,
and alt.culture.internet.  I have made several comments in those
forums on Ms. Hauben's proposal, and pointed Ms. Hauben and others to
additional sources of information (both technical and historical) on
Internet development.


Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy