<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[alac] Proposal for process for the names for the President
- To: alac@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [alac] Proposal for process for the names for the President
- From: "Alice Wanjira" <alice@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 14:52:09 -0300 (BRT)
Agree with the process. Is it possible to alert Twomey so that we do not
loose out?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Vittorio Bertola" <vb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Interim ALAC" <alac@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2006 8:47 PM
Subject: [alac] Proposal for process for the names for the President
Strategy Cmt
> As discussed informally in the room: the suggested process is:
>
> - we get proposals for names (to be supplemented with a short bio) until
> Friday July 7th
> - we discuss on the list to try to come to consensus on a slate of three
> names
> - if we don't get to consensus (i.e. there are objections that are not
> withdrawn) by Friday July 14th, Annette calls a vote
> - each member gets to vote up to two(?) names, and the three most voted
> are approved.
>
> Is this fine?
> --
> vb. [Vittorio Bertola - v.bertola [a] bertola.eu.org]<-----
> http://bertola.eu.org/ <- Prima o poi...
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|