Hong, both very important points. I guess you can raise the issue also
in the President's Committee on IDNs.
Bret, could you give us a gNSO feedback on that and Siavash might keep
an eye on it and list it to our issues of policy developments.
Best
Annette
Hong Xue wrote:
>
>
> Thanks Bret for sending this to our list.
>
>
> The following points deserve our careful consideration:
>
> "Determining that a proposed new IDN label is adequately
> differentiated from a pre-existing label requires comparison in graphic,
> phonetic, and semantic terms."
>
> We don't know what was in the mind of those drafters when "Semantic
> terms" were used. It'd be very unpredictable if it means
> translations/transliterations of the pre-existing labels.
>
> "Be particularly mindful of detail which, although initially
> considered in the IDN context, may otherwise be relevant to the New gTLD
> PDP."
>
> I hope this does not mean that the IDN PDP will be somewhat linked to
> the New gTLD PDP, procedurally as well as substantively.
>
> Hong
>