Re: [alac] Voting on ALS applications

["Jacqueline Morris" <jam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Annette
I'm against the concept of postponing the vote in order to try to save
Jean the trouble of setting up of the tool more often. In that cae,
the best thing would be not to vote at all, and then she'd have no
trouble at all!
If necessary, I'll assist in setting it up.
Again, I think that we should vote on ALS applications regularly every
month, if there are any. For example, set the third week of every
month as voting week, or hte last week - just before or just after the
teleconference... I don't have a preference when, just that we should
have it set and it should be regular and frequent.
Jacqueline
On 8/28/06, Annette Muehlberg <annette.muehlberg@xxxxxx> wrote:
> Bruce,
>
> Several ALAC member already pointed out: We spend too much time waiting
> for the completion of the due diligence forms. Let us vote on those
> applications we have the due diligence forms on. I do not understand
> though what is the problem with the others and expected those to be
> finished a long time ago.
>
> Anyhow, could you please send to the ALAC members in one mail all
> applications and the respective due diligence form (of those you have
> available). Jean will then again have to set up the voting tool again
> (sorry for you Jean, this is what we tried to avoid by getting all
> together and vote on them at once). Meanwhile each region tells us on
> which application they agree and if so - on which not - and why.
>
> Thank you
>
> Annette


--
Jacqueline Morris
www.carnivalondenet.com
T&T Music and videos online