Re: [alac] Voting on ALS applications

[Annette Muehlberg <annette.muehlberg@xxxxxx>]

Jaqueline,
this is a misunderstanding. I said I would like to start the voting 
procedure now! - on those we have the due diligince forms.
The real problem we face is, that we do not have all and I hope that 
Bruce can send them to us soon.
best
Annette

Jacqueline Morris wrote:

> Annette
> I'm against the concept of postponing the vote in order to try to save
> Jean the trouble of setting up of the tool more often. In that cae,
> the best thing would be not to vote at all, and then she'd have no
> trouble at all!
> If necessary, I'll assist in setting it up.
> Again, I think that we should vote on ALS applications regularly every
> month, if there are any. For example, set the third week of every
> month as voting week, or hte last week - just before or just after the
> teleconference... I don't have a preference when, just that we should
> have it set and it should be regular and frequent.
> Jacqueline
> On 8/28/06, Annette Muehlberg <annette.muehlberg@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Bruce,
> >
> > Several ALAC member already pointed out: We spend too much time waiting
> > for the completion of the due diligence forms. Let us vote on those
> > applications we have the due diligence forms on. I do not understand
> > though what is the problem with the others and expected those to be
> > finished a long time ago.
> >
> > Anyhow, could you please send to the ALAC members in one mail all
> > applications and the respective due diligence form (of those you have
> > available). Jean will then again have to set up the voting tool again
> > (sorry for you Jean, this is what we tried to avoid by getting all
> > together and vote on them at once). Meanwhile each region tells us on
> > which application they agree and if so - on which not - and why.
> >
> > Thank you
> >
> > Annette