<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [bc-gnso] Proposal for meeting with .BRANDS
- To: "'Ron Andruff'" <randruff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <martinsutton@xxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [bc-gnso] Proposal for meeting with .BRANDS
- From: "Marie Pattullo" <marie.pattullo@xxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 15:42:49 +0100
All,
I checked with AIM’s members as to who is hoping to attend the meeting in
Beijing, but so far I’ve drawn a blank. They tell me that they don’t find it
surprising that not many brands are attending, as they aren’t running a domain
name Registries so much as being busy concentrating on their core business.
Businesses have already budgeted huge sums to apply for/protect domains - it's
becoming harder to justify several long-haul trips a year to ICANN meetings.
It's certainly not because they’re uninterested
Marie
From: owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ron
Andruff
Sent: lundi 4 mars 2013 18:21
To: martinsutton@xxxxxxxx
Cc: 'bc - GNSO list'
Subject: RE: [bc-gnso] Proposal for meeting with .BRANDS
Thank you for sharing this with the members, Martin.
Two comments:
(1) taking into consideration your comments about who from brands will be in
attendance in BJ, it seems even more important to send invite letters to all
brand TLD applicants to see if we can encourage more participation in ICANN
rather than have their consultants act as middlemen. I have nothing against
consultants doing their job, but it is clearly better to have the principals in
the room rather than their filters if ICANN is going to expand its mindshare in
the business sector; and
(2) your RA submission to ICANN was enlightening to read as it brought new
information to light that I had not considered. Getting this kind of input
from the broader group of .BRAND applicants would be very valuable to the
community. Can we look to you to evangelize the need of the rest of the
business community to hear and learn more from our applicant brethren?
Kind regards,
RA
Ronald N. Andruff
RNA Partners, Inc. <http://www.rnapartners.com>
_____
From: owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
martinsutton@xxxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2013 11:40 AM
To: Ron Andruff
Cc: 'bc - GNSO list'; 'Elisa Cooper'; owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [bc-gnso] Registry Conf Call & Proposal for meeting with .BRANDS
Ron,
For many of the .brand applicants, ICANN and the gTLD programme (still)
represents an insignificant part of their overall business. Hence, many
applicants will expect their consultants to cover the ICANN chores, rather than
be present themselves.
Nevertheless, I would hope that those applicants based closer to Beijing will
be taking the opportunity to attend in April.
As you know, I am an applicant for .hsbc and have been engaging with other
.brand applicants to identify ways to ensure that our interests are represented
within the ICANN structure going forward. I would be happy to facilitate a
discussion with the BC on .brand perspectives with those that will be available
in Beijing. In the meantime, the attached paper was submitted by this group to
ICANN in response to the public comment period for the RA changes;
Kind regards,
Martin
<http://directory.global.hsbc/cgi-whitepages/search-entry.pl?attribute_extramail=mail&operator_extramail=sw&unused_searching=no&co=*&value_extramail=martinsutton@xxxxxxxx>
Martin C SUTTON
Group Risk
Manager, Group Fraud Risk and Intelligence | HSBC HOLDINGS PLC HGHQ
Group Security & Fraud Risk
8 Canada Square,Canary Wharf,London,E14 5HQ,United Kingdom
________________________________________________________________
Phone
+44 (0)20 7991 8074 / 7991 8074
Mobile
+44 (0) 7774556680
Email
<mailto:martinsutton@xxxxxxxx> martinsutton@xxxxxxxx
________________________________________________________________
Protect our environment - please only print this if you have to!
From:
"Ron Andruff" <randruff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To:
"'Elisa Cooper'" <Elisa.Cooper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'bc - GNSO list'"
<bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:
04/03/2013 16:09
Subject:
RE: [bc-gnso] Registry Conf Call & Proposal for meeting with .BRANDS
Sent by:
owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx
_____
Thanks for the prompt reply, Elisa.
Considering that there are 637 brand TLD applications, one would think that all
(or a majority of them) would be showing up at an ICANN meeting, so I am
somewhat surprised that you are aware of only a few attending… Perhaps, as
Chair, you could work with our Secretariat to send invitations out to all of
them? That outreach could have a tangential benefit insomuch as the invitees
may also be potential BC members. We have some six weeks or so before the
meeting, why not go for it?
Regarding the webinar suggestion, I am a strong believer of face-to-face
meetings whenever possible so my first vote goes there. If we do go the
webinar route, I would recommend a new title: A New Era for Business on the
Internet: Informing and Educating about .BRANDs.
Hope that this helps move this discussion forward.
Kind regards,
RA
Ronald N. Andruff
<http://www.rnapartners.com/> RNA Partners, Inc.
_____
From: Elisa Cooper [ <mailto:Elisa.Cooper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
mailto:Elisa.Cooper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2013 10:27 AM
To: Ron Andruff; 'bc - GNSO list'
Subject: RE: [bc-gnso] Registry Conf Call & Proposal for meeting with .BRANDS
Ron,
I am on the call – but will only be able to attend the first 60 minutes. The
call will be recorded and transcribed for those unable to attend.
Regarding your separate comment - I would be in support of inviting .Brands to
meet with us in Beijing. Of those that I personally know that are attending
(which is just a few), I have already invited them to join our meeting
scheduled on Constituency Day (Tuesday).
That said, we might also consider reaching out to them and inviting them prior
to Beijing, to a webinar entitled, “Understanding and Influencing ICANN”.
Thoughts?
Best,
Elisa
Elisa Cooper
Director of Product Marketing
MarkMonitor
208 389-5779 PH
From: owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx [ <mailto:owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx>
mailto:owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ron Andruff
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2013 8:10 AM
To: 'bc - GNSO list'
Subject: [bc-gnso] Registry Conf Call & Proposal for meeting with .BRANDS
Good morning all.
Just sending a note to the list to inquire as to how many BC members will be on
the Registry call that is starting now? Perhaps our Secretriat could pull
together a list for everyone’s benefit?
Separately, in preparation for this call I was going through the filings and
came to realize (again) that that there are 637 .BRANDS from the 1900. Many of
them are brands we know and some are BC members. Others we don’t know…
Question for the Ex Com: Would it not make sense to invite the .BRANDS to come
to meet the BC in Beijing? For my part, it would be extremely helpful to hear
from them and to have an opportunity to learn more. Perhaps we could invite
them for the CSG breakfast on Tuesday, if guests have not already been
scheduled for that meeting slot.
It seems to me that BC members would benefit greatly from meeting with
businesses that are applying for top-level domains.
My two cents.
Kind regards,
RA
Ronald N. Andruff
<http://www.rnapartners.com/> RNA Partners, Inc.
************************************************************
HSBC Holdings plc
Registered Office: 8 Canada Square, London E14 5HQ, United Kingdom
Registered in England number 617987
************************************************************
----------------------------------------- SAVE PAPER - THINK BEFORE YOU PRINT!
This E-mail is confidential. It may also be legally privileged. If you are not
the addressee you may not copy, forward, disclose or use any part of it. If you
have received this message in error, please delete it and all copies from your
system and notify the sender immediately by return E-mail. Internet
communications cannot be guaranteed to be timely secure, error or virus-free.
The sender does not accept liability for any errors or omissions.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|