ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[bc-gnso]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [bc-gnso] RE: FOR REVIEW: draft BC comment on study of Whois misuse

  • To: "Fares, David" <dfares@xxxxxxxx>, Steve Delbianco <sdelbianco@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, John Berard <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jimson Olufuye <jolufuye@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "skawaguchi fb.com" <skawaguchi@xxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [bc-gnso] RE: FOR REVIEW: draft BC comment on study of Whois misuse
  • From: Marilyn Cade <marilynscade@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 08:38:51 -0500

Looks good to me. 
Marilyn 

From: DFares@xxxxxxxx
To: sdelbianco@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; 
jolufuye@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; skawaguchi@xxxxxx
CC: bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [bc-gnso] RE: FOR REVIEW: draft BC comment on study of Whois misuse
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 10:10:50 +0000









Thanks Steve, I think this works.
 


From: Steve DelBianco [mailto:sdelbianco@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]


Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2014 11:36 PM

To: Fares, David; John Berard; Jimson Olufuye; skawaguchi@xxxxxx

Cc: 'bc-GNSO@xxxxxxxxx GNSO list'

Subject: Re: FOR REVIEW: draft BC comment on study of Whois misuse


 



David — thanks for that suggestion.  Here’s my reaction for you and the 
drafters of this comment:


 


The whole point of this study was to test the validity of claims by privacy 
advocates that misuse of public Whois was responsible for spam, harassment, and 
other abuse of registrants. 


 


First, we should say that this latest study does
not document abuse arising from public access, so there is no justification to 
limit public access.


 


Second, we can claim that any restrictions on whois access that might be 
contemplated should nonetheless preserve access by any party needing to know 
the identity of who controls
 a domain where there is evidence of actionable harm.


 




From:
<Fares>, David Fares <DFares@xxxxxxxx>

Date: Tuesday, January 14, 2014 at 4:43 AM

To: Steve DelBianco <sdelbianco@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'bc-GNSO@xxxxxxxxx GNSO list'" 
<bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx>

Subject: RE: FOR REVIEW: draft BC comment on study of Whois misuse


 



Steve,
 
Thank you for a well drafted statement.  Would it  be possible to incorporate 
into the comment that measures to address misuse should not jeopardize access
 to Whois data?  
 
Thanks,
David
 


From:
owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Steve DelBianco

Sent: Friday, January 10, 2014 8:42 PM

To: 'bc-GNSO@xxxxxxxxx GNSO list'

Subject: [bc-gnso] FOR REVIEW: draft BC comment on study of Whois misuse


 


ICANN posted a  Study on Whois Misuse.  


 


Back in 2009 the BC prompted this study to learn whether "Public access to 
WHOIS data leads to a measurable degree of misuse – that is, to actions that 
cause actual harm, are
 illegal or illegitimate, or otherwise contrary to the stated legitimate 
purpose."


 


We discussed this study on our 5-Dec member call.  Three BC members volunteered 
to review and draft comments on the study  (Jimson Olufuye, Susan Kawaguchi, 
John Berard).


 





As discussed on our 9-Jan call, their proposed comment is brief and should be 
easy for members to do an expedited review before ICANN's due date of 
18-Jan-2014.




 


So please review the attached and REPLY ALL with your comments or objections 
before 18-Jan-2014.


 


Thanks again to Jimson, Susan, and John for stepping-up to this.


 


Best,


Steve DelBianco


Vice chair for policy coordination


 


This message and its attachments may contain legally privileged or confidential 
information. It is intended solely for the named addressee. If you are not the 
addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message 
to the addressee),
 you may not copy or deliver this message or its attachments to anyone. Rather, 
you should permanently delete this message and its attachments and kindly 
notify the sender by reply e-mail. Any content of this message and its 
attachments that does not relate
 to the official business of Twenty-First Century Fox, Inc. or its subsidiaries 
must be taken not to have been sent or endorsed by any of them. No 
representation is made that this email or its attachments are without defect.




 This message and its attachments may contain legally privileged or 
confidential information. It is intended solely for the named addressee. If you 
are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of 
the message to the addressee), you may not copy or deliver this message or its 
attachments to anyone. Rather, you should permanently delete this message and 
its attachments and kindly notify the sender by reply e-mail. Any content of 
this message and its attachments that does not relate to the official business 
of Twenty-First Century Fox, Inc. or its subsidiaries must be taken not to have 
been sent or endorsed by any of them. No representation is made that this email 
or its attachments are without defect.                                       


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy