<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [bc-gnso] RE: FOR REVIEW: draft BC comment on study of Whois misuse
- To: "Fares, David" <dfares@xxxxxxxx>, Steve Delbianco <sdelbianco@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, John Berard <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jimson Olufuye <jolufuye@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "skawaguchi fb.com" <skawaguchi@xxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [bc-gnso] RE: FOR REVIEW: draft BC comment on study of Whois misuse
- From: Marilyn Cade <marilynscade@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 08:38:51 -0500
Looks good to me.
Marilyn
From: DFares@xxxxxxxx
To: sdelbianco@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
jolufuye@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; skawaguchi@xxxxxx
CC: bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [bc-gnso] RE: FOR REVIEW: draft BC comment on study of Whois misuse
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 10:10:50 +0000
Thanks Steve, I think this works.
From: Steve DelBianco [mailto:sdelbianco@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2014 11:36 PM
To: Fares, David; John Berard; Jimson Olufuye; skawaguchi@xxxxxx
Cc: 'bc-GNSO@xxxxxxxxx GNSO list'
Subject: Re: FOR REVIEW: draft BC comment on study of Whois misuse
David — thanks for that suggestion. Here’s my reaction for you and the
drafters of this comment:
The whole point of this study was to test the validity of claims by privacy
advocates that misuse of public Whois was responsible for spam, harassment, and
other abuse of registrants.
First, we should say that this latest study does
not document abuse arising from public access, so there is no justification to
limit public access.
Second, we can claim that any restrictions on whois access that might be
contemplated should nonetheless preserve access by any party needing to know
the identity of who controls
a domain where there is evidence of actionable harm.
From:
<Fares>, David Fares <DFares@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Tuesday, January 14, 2014 at 4:43 AM
To: Steve DelBianco <sdelbianco@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'bc-GNSO@xxxxxxxxx GNSO list'"
<bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: FOR REVIEW: draft BC comment on study of Whois misuse
Steve,
Thank you for a well drafted statement. Would it be possible to incorporate
into the comment that measures to address misuse should not jeopardize access
to Whois data?
Thanks,
David
From:
owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Steve DelBianco
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2014 8:42 PM
To: 'bc-GNSO@xxxxxxxxx GNSO list'
Subject: [bc-gnso] FOR REVIEW: draft BC comment on study of Whois misuse
ICANN posted a Study on Whois Misuse.
Back in 2009 the BC prompted this study to learn whether "Public access to
WHOIS data leads to a measurable degree of misuse – that is, to actions that
cause actual harm, are
illegal or illegitimate, or otherwise contrary to the stated legitimate
purpose."
We discussed this study on our 5-Dec member call. Three BC members volunteered
to review and draft comments on the study (Jimson Olufuye, Susan Kawaguchi,
John Berard).
As discussed on our 9-Jan call, their proposed comment is brief and should be
easy for members to do an expedited review before ICANN's due date of
18-Jan-2014.
So please review the attached and REPLY ALL with your comments or objections
before 18-Jan-2014.
Thanks again to Jimson, Susan, and John for stepping-up to this.
Best,
Steve DelBianco
Vice chair for policy coordination
This message and its attachments may contain legally privileged or confidential
information. It is intended solely for the named addressee. If you are not the
addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message
to the addressee),
you may not copy or deliver this message or its attachments to anyone. Rather,
you should permanently delete this message and its attachments and kindly
notify the sender by reply e-mail. Any content of this message and its
attachments that does not relate
to the official business of Twenty-First Century Fox, Inc. or its subsidiaries
must be taken not to have been sent or endorsed by any of them. No
representation is made that this email or its attachments are without defect.
This message and its attachments may contain legally privileged or
confidential information. It is intended solely for the named addressee. If you
are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of
the message to the addressee), you may not copy or deliver this message or its
attachments to anyone. Rather, you should permanently delete this message and
its attachments and kindly notify the sender by reply e-mail. Any content of
this message and its attachments that does not relate to the official business
of Twenty-First Century Fox, Inc. or its subsidiaries must be taken not to have
been sent or endorsed by any of them. No representation is made that this email
or its attachments are without defect.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|