RE: [bc-gnso] FOR REVIEW: BC comment on ICANN's focus for 5-year strategic plan

["Fares, David" <DFares@xxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Aparna, happy to discuss.  It would be helpful to get guidance as to the 
existing BC position on this issue.  My recollection is that we recognize that 
public interest issues within the context of ICANN’s mandate are within its 
purview.

From: Aparna Sridhar [mailto:aparnasridhar@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2014 2:13 PM
To: Fares, David
Cc: Marilyn Cade; Steve Delbianco; bc - GNSO list; Chen, Tim; Chris at Andalucia
Subject: Re: [bc-gnso] FOR REVIEW: BC comment on ICANN's focus for 5-year 
strategic plan

Hi David,

Google doesn't object to including a mention of the public interest.  I was 
merely channeling the original text, which took that position, and reframing it 
in a way that I thought was more clear.  I had assumed that it was an 
established BC position to look skeptically at that language.  If that's not 
the case, I am happy to have a broader discussion with the group.

Cheers,

Aparna Sridhar
Counsel
Google Inc.
1101 New York Avenue N.W.
Second Floor
Washington, DC 20005
tel:  202.346.1261
e-mail: aparnasridhar@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:aparnasridhar@xxxxxxxxxx>

On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 2:08 PM, Fares, David 
<DFares@xxxxxxxx<mailto:DFares@xxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Aparna,

Thank you for sharing your comments.  21st Century Fox agrees that ICANN should 
focus on its narrow mandate related to Internet names and numbers.  However, no 
matter how hard ICANN tries, its technical mandate will impact the public 
interest.  Indeed, this is one of the important reasons the GAC was formed, to 
ensure that ICANN’s technical work comports with public policies, including 
those that impact the public interest.  With this in mind, we do not support 
the deletion of references to the public interest but agree that ICANN should 
limit public interest matters to those that arise out of ICANN’s technical 
mandate for the name and numbering system.

We are happy to discuss.

Best regards,
David

From: owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx> 
[mailto:owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx>] On Behalf Of 
Aparna Sridhar
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2014 6:13 PM
To: Marilyn Cade
Cc: Steve Delbianco; bc - GNSO list; Chen, Tim; Chris at Andalucia
Subject: Re: [bc-gnso] FOR REVIEW: BC comment on ICANN's focus for 5-year 
strategic plan

All--

Please see some suggested edits from Google on the attached document.  While 
there is some amount of reorganizing, I believe our suggested edits preserve 
the points made in the original document while making some improvements for 
flow and clarity.  I have also suggested deviation from ICANN's proposed 
submission form where adhering to it obscured the content of our comments.

Cheers,
Aparna

Aparna Sridhar
Counsel
Google Inc.
1101 New York Avenue N.W.
Second Floor
Washington, DC 20005
tel:  202.346.1261<tel:202.346.1261>
e-mail: aparnasridhar@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:aparnasridhar@xxxxxxxxxx>

On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 12:51 PM, Marilyn Cade 
<marilynscade@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:marilynscade@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
I will draft something for ICANN mission/lingage to I-GOV. I wanted to hear 
from CCWG and 1NET first, and that happened this week.

I also moved this to bc-private just temporarily.

David, Aparna, Philip, and I were on CCWG and David, Aparna, and others from 
business COMMUNITY, were on relevant calls last week. I will send a short 
assessment over week end.

If members want public access to our discussions, we can move back to public 
list, but I didn't want to do that, without full consideration from BC members.

M
________________________________
From: sdelbianco@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:sdelbianco@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx>
CC: tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; 
chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [bc-gnso] FOR REVIEW: BC comment on ICANN's focus for 5-year strategic 
plan
Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2014 17:27:45 +0000

Attached is the current draft BC comment on ICANN’s Vision, Mission & Focus for 
5-year Strategic Plan, which came out of last summer’s "brainstorming" by 
board, community and staff. 
(link<http://www.icann.org/en/about/planning/strategic-engagement/focus-areas-29oct13-en.pdf>)

Tim Chen and Chris Chaplow led drafting of the BC comment, with help from 
Martin Sutton, Marilyn Cade, and Andrew Mack.

Comments close 31-Jan, so today begins our 14-day review period.

We need draft comments for Focus Area V: Defining role clarity for ICANN in the 
Internet governance ecosystem.
Yesterday I shared my views about ICANN limiting its mission and avoiding 
entanglements in the broader I-Gov debate.       If no BC members contribute 
text for Area V, then I can draft something next week.

Please REPLY ALL with edits (TRACK CHANGES)as soon as possible, since the 
comment deadline is 31-Jan-2014.

Thanks again to Tim and Chris for taking the lead on this.

—
Steve DelBianco
Vice chair for policy coordination




This message and its attachments may contain legally privileged or confidential 
information. It is intended solely for the named addressee. If you are not the 
addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message 
to the addressee), you may not copy or deliver this message or its attachments 
to anyone. Rather, you should permanently delete this message and its 
attachments and kindly notify the sender by reply e-mail. Any content of this 
message and its attachments that does not relate to the official business of 
Twenty-First Century Fox, Inc. or its subsidiaries must be taken not to have 
been sent or endorsed by any of them. No representation is made that this email 
or its attachments are without defect.


This message and its attachments may contain legally privileged or confidential 
information. It is intended solely for the named addressee. If you are not the 
addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message 
to the addressee), you may not copy or deliver this message or its attachments 
to anyone. Rather, you should permanently delete this message and its 
attachments and kindly notify the sender by reply e-mail. Any content of this 
message and its attachments that does not relate to the official business of 
Twenty-First Century Fox, Inc. or its subsidiaries must be taken not to have 
been sent or endorsed by any of them. No representation is made that this email 
or its attachments are without defect.