RE: [ga] domain tasting comments

[jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]

Dominik and all,

  See my remarks and responses below Dominiks...

-----Original Message-----
>From: Dominik Filipp <dominik.filipp@xxxxxxxx>
>Sent: Mar 28, 2008 2:28 AM
>To: jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, domain-tasting-motion@xxxxxxxxx
>Cc: GA <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Roberto Gaetano <roberto@xxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: RE: [ga] domain tasting comments
>
>
>Jeff,
>
>See my lines below
>
>> Of course it is. Yet again changing or amending
>> the RAA's regarding the AGP is not going to necessarly
>> accomplish killing Tasting.
>
>The AGP elimination will definitely eliminate tasting. It does not
>eliminate other forms of speculation however.

  Of course not entirely.  That is why some technical changes
to the registration software used is necessary along with 
fairly robust oversight 24/7, by ICANN staff.
>
>
>> Better would be to monitor
>> deletes and if they rise above a certain level of a
>> considered norm, revoke or suspend that
>> registrars/registries Accreditation. If such levels
>> are reached or exceeded more than three times in any
>> given 6 month period, revoke that registrars and/or
>> registries Accreditation perminantly and temporarly
>> reassign those functions to whatever existing
>> registrar/registry or other qualified entity that is
>> interested in managing same properly and ethically.
>> OR, require and verify modifications to the registration
>> software that prevents Tasting as I have already suggested.
>
>Disagree. None human oversight based on plethora of unclear bylaws
>vulnerable to being neglected or abused can replace inherent systemic
>element principally avoiding fraudulent activity. If such exists, of
>course. Fortunately, domain tasting is the case.
>The oversight should be necessary if there is no other way to ensure it
>in such fundamental way. Unfortunately, as in most situations in real
>life.

  This response of yours is assuming that all registrars and/or
registries as well as registrants are frauds.  That is certainly
NOT the case.  Ergo, oversight need not be verbose as you seem
to suggest.  We should not act our of fear of paranoia, but
rather out of simple logic and known historic experiance.
>
>Dominik
>
>...
>
>Regards,
>
>Jeffrey A. Williams
>Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 277k members/stakeholders strong!)
>"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
>   Abraham Lincoln
>
>"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is very
>often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt
>
>"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
>liability
>depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
>P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
>United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
>===============================================================
>Updated 1/26/04
>CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS. div.
>of
>Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
>ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail
>jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Phone: 214-244-4827
>
Regards,

Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 277k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
   Abraham Lincoln

"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is very
often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt

"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability
depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS. div. of
Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Phone: 214-244-4827