<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [dssa] a thread for Dakar-meeting feedback
- To: "Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [dssa] a thread for Dakar-meeting feedback
- From: "James M. Galvin" <jgalvin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 20:09:03 +0000
On Oct 25, 2011, at 12:19 PM, Mike O'Connor wrote:
have we missed any Compliance-related vulnerabilities or threats in
our list so far? one of the topics they talked about in their
slides was Registrar data-escrow -- i suppose that would fall in the
"failover" pile, but we're mostly concentrating on registries in
that area.
We may be overlooking something here. Consider that COM and NET are
both thin registries as compared to all other gTLD registries. This
means that the data you want to be escrowed is only found at the
registrar.
Jim
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|