<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[gnso-acc-sgb] Blended proposal
- To: <gnso-acc-sgb@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [gnso-acc-sgb] Blended proposal
- From: "Milton Mueller" <Mueller@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 09:01:48 -0400
>>> Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx> 5/30/2007 2:52 AM >>>
>why would such a procedure be
>restricted to banks? wouldn't it be equally
>applicable to any sector that could get the
>country it was in to create the laws it wanted.
That was the same question I had.
Palmer's reply did not really answer it, but there is an answer.
The answer is that a) governmentally-charted banks are easier to
certify, and b) a query screening protocol that is focused on a specific
set of problems (e.g., phishing) would be more workable than a general
one.
I personally would have little objection to the implementation of a
proposal like this if it was restricted to banks pursuing time-sensitive
Internet-based fraud that targets bank consumers.
I think the proposal would break down if applied more widely.
There are also some important missing elements in the proposal.
* Who would establish this query-screening process: ICANN?
* How would the centralized database be established?
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|