RE: [gnso-arr-dt] Modified proposal for GNSO endorsement of AoC RT candidates

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks for doing this Tim.  This looks pretty good to me.  What do
others think?

Chuck 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Tim Ruiz
> Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 10:59 AM
> To: gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [gnso-arr-dt] Modified proposal for GNSO endorsement 
> of AoC RT candidates
> 
> 
> Based on what we currently know about the selection process 
> and comments from Bill and Wolf, I propose the following process:
> 
> Regardless of the number of seats allocated to the GNSO for a Review
> Team:
> 
>    1. Each SG receives a copy of all applications whose candidate 
>        designates affiliation with that particular SG, and a 
> copy of all
> 
>        applications of unaffiliated candidates;
> 
>    2. Each SG endorses a candidate and forwards their endorsement 
>        to the Council.
> 
> The Council will review the pool of endorsements and discuss 
> any concerns regarding geographic and/or gender diversity:
> 
>    1. Any Councilor may propose that one or more unendorsed 
> candidates be
>       endorsed and included to improve on geographic or 
> gender diversity;
> 
>    2. Any such cadidates proposed must receive a majority 
> vote of both houses
>       of the Council to be endorsed and included.
> 
> The Council forwards the resultant pool of endorsed 
> candidates to the Selectors.
> 
> Instructions from Council to the SGs will include appropriate 
> timelines.
> 
> 
> Tim
> 
> 
>