ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-arr-dt]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

AW: [gnso-arr-dt] Modified proposal for GNSO endorsement of AoC RT candidates

  • To: <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: AW: [gnso-arr-dt] Modified proposal for GNSO endorsement of AoC RT candidates
  • From: <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 5 May 2010 15:53:51 +0200

It looks ok to me. See my comments below.



Regards
Wolf-Ulrich

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: owner-gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx] Im 
Auftrag von Gomes, Chuck
Gesendet: Montag, 3. Mai 2010 06:27
An: Tim Ruiz; gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Betreff: RE: [gnso-arr-dt] Modified proposal for GNSO endorsement of AoC RT 
candidates


Thanks for doing this Tim.  This looks pretty good to me.  What do
others think?

Chuck

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Tim Ruiz
> Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 10:59 AM
> To: gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [gnso-arr-dt] Modified proposal for GNSO endorsement
> of AoC RT candidates
>
>
> Based on what we currently know about the selection process
> and comments from Bill and Wolf, I propose the following process:
>
> Regardless of the number of seats allocated to the GNSO for a Review
> Team:
>
>    1. Each SG receives a copy of all applications whose candidate
>        designates affiliation with that particular SG, and a
> copy of all
>
>        applications of unaffiliated candidates;

[WUK]: Anyway according to the general process all applications shall be made 
public on the ICANN webpage.
>
>    2. Each SG endorses a candidate [WUK]: means "one candidate if any" and 
> forwards their endorsement
>        to the Council.
>
> The Council will review the pool of endorsements and discuss
> any concerns regarding geographic and/or gender diversity:
>
>    1. Any Councilor may propose that one or more unendorsed
> candidates be
>       endorsed and included to improve on geographic or
> gender diversity;
>
>    2. Any such cadidates proposed must receive a majority
> vote of both houses
>       of the Council to be endorsed and included.
>
> The Council forwards the resultant pool of endorsed
> candidates to the Selectors.
>
> Instructions from Council to the SGs will include appropriate
> timelines.
>
>
> Tim
>
>
>





<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy